Scope Compliance Uncertainty Estimate
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The zeitgeist of the digital era has been dominated by an expanding integration of Artificial Intelligence~(AI) in a plethora of applications across various domains. With this expansion, however, questions of the safety and reliability of these methods come have become more relevant than ever. Consequently, a run-time ML model safety system has been developed to ensure the model's operation within the intended context, especially in applications whose environments are greatly variable such as Autonomous Vehicles~(AVs). SafeML is a model-agnostic approach for performing such monitoring, using distance measures based on statistical testing of the training and operational datasets; comparing them to a predetermined threshold, returning a binary value whether the model should be trusted in the context of the observed data or be deemed unreliable. Although a systematic framework exists for this approach, its performance is hindered by: (1) a dependency on a number of design parameters that directly affect the selection of a safety threshold and therefore likely affect its robustness, (2) an inherent assumption of certain distributions for the training and operational sets, as well as (3) a high computational complexity for relatively large sets. This work addresses these limitations by changing the binary decision to a continuous metric. Furthermore, all data distribution assumptions are made obsolete by implementing non-parametric approaches, and the computational speed increased by introducing a new distance measure based on the Empirical Characteristics Functions~(ECF).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.
Builds on
10 of 27 references.
References · 10
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020Importance-Driven Deep Learning System Testingcited by 24
- 2020SafeML: Safety Monitoring of Machine Learning Classifiers through Statistical Difference Measurecited by 16
- 2020Efficient Certification of Spatial Robustnesscited by 11
- 2016Artificial Intelligence Safety and Cybersecurity: a Timeline of AI Failurescited by 9
- 2019A Provable Defense for Deep Residual Networkscited by 5
- 2019Detection and Mitigation of Rare Subclasses in Deep Neural Network Classifierscited by 4
- 2022Keep your Distance: Determining Sampling and Distance Thresholds in Machine Learning Monitoringcited by 4
- 2022StaDRe and StaDRo: Reliability and Robustness Estimation of ML-based Forecasting using Statistical Distance Measurescited by 3
- 2020A New ECDF Two-Sample Test Statisticcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Q-SafeML: Safety Assessment of Quantum Machine Learning via Quantum Distance Metricscited by 1
- 2025Incorporating Failure of Machine Learning in Dynamic Probabilistic Safety Assurancecited by 0
- 2025Safer Skin Lesion Classification with Global Class Activation Probability Map Evaluation and SafeMLcited by 0
- 2025Q-SafeML: Safety Assessment of Quantum Machine Learning via Quantum Distance Metrics4 Sep 2025
- 2025Safer Skin Lesion Classification with Global Class Activation Probability Map Evaluation and SafeML28 Aug 2025
- 2025Incorporating Failure of Machine Learning in Dynamic Probabilistic Safety Assurance7 Jun 2025