mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robustness Evaluation of Deep Unsupervised Learning Algorithms for Intrusion Detection Systems

arXiv 2207.03576 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2022cs.CR cs.LG cs.NIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, advances in deep learning have been observed in various fields, including computer vision, natural language processing, and cybersecurity. Machine learning (ML) has demonstrated its ability as a potential tool for anomaly detection-based intrusion detection systems to build secure computer networks. Increasingly, ML approaches are widely adopted than heuristic approaches for cybersecurity because they learn directly from data. Data is critical for the development of ML systems, and becomes potential targets for attackers. Basically, data poisoning or contamination is one of the most common techniques used to fool ML models through data. This paper evaluates the robustness of six recent deep learning algorithms for intrusion detection on contaminated data. Our experiments suggest that the state-of-the-art algorithms used in this study are sensitive to data contamination and reveal the importance of self-defense against data perturbation when developing novel models, especially for intrusion detection systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2022.

Builds on

18 of 38 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  2. 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
  3. 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
  4. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 414
  5. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 358
  6. 2016Adversarial Feature Learningcited by 350
  7. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
  8. 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 211
  9. 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 201
  10. 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 197
  11. 2020Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class Classificationcited by 133
  12. 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 130
6 more
  1. 2018Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detectioncited by 115
  2. 2016Deep Structured Energy Based Models for Anomaly Detectioncited by 114
  3. 2021Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Imagescited by 99
  4. 2018Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning?cited by 93
  5. 2020On Certifying Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 77
  6. 2022A Revealing Large-Scale Evaluation of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithmscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Robustness Analysis of Machine Learning Models for IoT Intrusion Detection Under Data Poisoning Attacks
  2. 2022Poisoning Attacks and Defenses on Artificial Intelligence: A Survey
  3. 2022Machine Learning Security against Data Poisoning: Are We There Yet?
  4. 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoning
  5. 2025Detecting and Preventing Data Poisoning Attacks on AI Models
  6. 2025On Robustness of Linear Classifiers to Targeted Data Poisoning
  7. 2023Pick your Poison: Undetectability versus Robustness in Data Poisoning Attacks
  8. 2021ML Attack Models: Adversarial Attacks and Data Poisoning Attacks