mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Word Embedding for Social Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Survey

arXiv 2207.03086 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2022cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To extract essential information from complex data, computer scientists have been developing machine learning models that learn low-dimensional representation mode. From such advances in machine learning research, not only computer scientists but also social scientists have benefited and advanced their research because human behavior or social phenomena lies in complex data. However, this emerging trend is not well documented because different social science fields rarely cover each other's work, resulting in fragmented knowledge in the literature. To document this emerging trend, we survey recent studies that apply word embedding techniques to human behavior mining. We built a taxonomy to illustrate the methods and procedures used in the surveyed papers, aiding social science researchers in contextualizing their research within the literature on word embedding applications. This survey also conducts a simple experiment to warn that common similarity measurements used in the literature could yield different results even if they return consistent results at an aggregate level.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 126 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.

Builds on

38 of 126 references.

References · 38

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  4. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  5. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  6. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,004
  7. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  8. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 674
  9. 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
  10. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  11. 2017A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques and Applicationscited by 260
  12. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
26 more
  1. 2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Changecited by 219
  2. 2017Graph Embedding Techniques, Applications, and Performance: A Surveycited by 188
  3. 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
  4. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  5. 2018Poincar'e GloVe: Hyperbolic Word Embeddingscited by 155
  6. 2017A Survey on Network Embeddingcited by 142
  7. 2015Order-Embeddings of Images and Languagecited by 112
  8. 2014word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding methodcited by 109
  9. 2014Word Representations via Gaussian Embeddingcited by 96
  10. 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
  11. 2018The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddingscited by 87
  12. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  13. 2021A Survey on Embedding Dynamic Graphscited by 60
  14. 2014word2vec Parameter Learning Explainedcited by 53
  15. 2022Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Wordscited by 49
  16. 2017Dynamic Word Embeddings for Evolving Semantic Discoverycited by 38
  17. 2019Evaluating Word Embedding Models: Methods and Experimental Resultscited by 37
  18. 2020Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platformscited by 30
  19. 2014Notes on Noise Contrastive Estimation and Negative Samplingcited by 26
  20. 2021Network Representation Learning: From Preprocessing, Feature Extraction to Node Embeddingcited by 19
  21. 2019Simple dynamic word embeddings for mapping perceptions in the public spherecited by 7
  22. 2021Realised Volatility Forecasting: Machine Learning via Financial Word Embeddingcited by 7
  23. 2019Follow the Leader: Documents on the Leading Edge of Semantic Change Get More Citationscited by 6
  24. 2021Human Languages with Greater Information Density Increase Communication Speed, but Decrease Conversation Breadthcited by 5
  25. 2018Opacity, Obscurity, and the Geometry of Question-Askingcited by 1
  26. 2020RPD: A Distance Function Between Word Embeddingscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.