Explanations-Driven Active Feature Acquisition for Algorithmic Recourse
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic recourse methods typically assume that a predictive model has access to all features of an individual. In practice, decisions are often made with partial information, because features are costly to acquire. Active feature acquisition addresses cost-constrained prediction, but existing methods are explanation-agnostic: prior work provides explanations only after acquiring additional features, rather than using explanations to drive acquisition. This work flips that and treats algorithmic recourse and feature acquisition jointly. We use Markov Blanket theory to unify counterfactual, semifactual, and alterfactual explanations and to characterize how available recourse grows as features are acquired. Building on this framework, we propose an Explanation-Driven Feature Acquisition (EDFA) method that selects features by explanatory value per unit cost. The framework is further extended with distribution-free validity guarantees for recourse issued from partial information, which signal trustworthy, lower-cost recourse, along with a lower bound on the calibration data required to certify them. Experiments on 7 publicly available datasets with neural network-based predictive models show that EDFA acquires substantially fewer features than state-of-the-art AFA baselines while maintaining comparable accuracy and yielding more decision-relevant, actionable recourse. The implementation is available on GitHub.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
36 of 70 references.
References · 36
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
- 2021Distribution-Free, Risk-Controlling Prediction Setscited by 288
- 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2020Algorithmic recourse under imperfect causal knowledge: a probabilistic approachcited by 140
- 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
- 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
- 2018EDDI: Efficient Dynamic Discovery of High-Value Information with Partial VAEcited by 87
- 2020Towards Unifying Feature Attribution and Counterfactual Explanations: Different Means to the Same Endcited by 66
24 more
- 2020One Explanation Does Not Fit All: The Promise of Interactive Explanations for Machine Learning Transparencycited by 64
- 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
- 2020Active Feature Acquisition with Generative Surrogate Modelscited by 54
- 2022Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Tree-Based Ensemblescited by 49
- 2022Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 40
- 2022On the Robustness of Sparse Counterfactual Explanations to Adverse Perturbationscited by 32
- 2022On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Recoursecited by 32
- 2022Interpretable by Design: Learning Predictors by Composing Interpretable Queriescited by 28
- 2023Variational Information Pursuit for Interpretable Predictionscited by 25
- 2023Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 21
- 2023Even if Explanations: Prior Work, Desiderata & Benchmarks for Semi-Factual XAIcited by 20
- 2021A Few Good Counterfactuals: Generating Interpretable, Plausible and Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 19
- 2025A Survey on Active Feature Acquisition Strategiescited by 17
- 2022Reinforced Path Reasoning for Counterfactual Explainable Recommendationcited by 13
- 2023The Utility of "Even if..." Semifactual Explanation to Optimise Positive Outcomescited by 8
- 2023Navigating the Structured What-If Spaces: Counterfactual Generation via Structured Diffusioncited by 5
- 2025Reducing Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty through Multi-modal Data Acquisitioncited by 5
- 2024Even-if Explanations: Formal Foundations, Priorities and Complexitycited by 4
- 2023Counterfactual Explanations via Locally-guided Sequential Algorithmic Recoursecited by 3
- 2024Relevant Irrelevance: Generating Alterfactual Explanations for Image Classifierscited by 3
- 2024NoMatterXAI: Generating "No Matter What" Alterfactual Examples for Explaining Black-Box Text Classification Modelscited by 2
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification as a Principled Foundation for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 2
- 2023Iterative Partial Fulfillment of Counterfactual Explanations: Benefits and Riskscited by 1
- 2026From Universal to Individualized Actionability: Revisiting Personalization in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.