mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A systematic review of biologically-informed deep learning models for cancer: fundamental trends for encoding and interpreting oncology data

arXiv 2207.00812 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2022q-bio.QM cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is an increasing interest in the use of Deep Learning (DL) based methods as a supporting analytical framework in oncology. However, most direct applications of DL will deliver models with limited transparency and explainability, which constrain their deployment in biomedical settings. This systematic review discusses DL models used to support inference in cancer biology with a particular emphasis on multi-omics analysis. It focuses on how existing models address the need for better dialogue with prior knowledge, biological plausibility and interpretability, fundamental properties in the biomedical domain. For this, we retrieved and analyzed 42 studies focusing on emerging architectural and methodological advances, the encoding of biological domain knowledge and the integration of explainability methods. We discuss the recent evolutionary arch of DL models in the direction of integrating prior biological relational and network knowledge to support better generalisation (e.g. pathways or Protein-Protein-Interaction networks) and interpretability. This represents a fundamental functional shift towards models which can integrate mechanistic and statistical inference aspects. We introduce a concept of bio-centric interpretability and according to its taxonomy, we discuss representational methodologies for the integration of domain prior knowledge in such models. The paper provides a critical outlook into contemporary methods for explainability and interpretabiltiy used in DL for cancer. The analysis points in the direction of a convergence between encoding prior knowledge and improved interpretability. We introduce bio-centric interpretability which is an important step towards formalisation of biological interpretability of DL models and developing methods that are less problem- or application-specific.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 132 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2022.

Builds on

27 of 132 references.

References · 27

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  5. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  7. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  8. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  9. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  10. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
  11. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
  12. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
15 more
  1. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
  2. 2017struc2vec: Learning Node Representations from Structural Identitycited by 215
  3. 2019Informed Machine Learning -- A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Knowledge into Learning Systemscited by 205
  4. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 199
  5. 2017What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?cited by 129
  6. 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
  7. 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
  8. 2020Interpretability of machine learning based prediction models in healthcarecited by 75
  9. 2020Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tourcited by 55
  10. 2020A Survey on Explainability in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 33
  11. 2019A Selective Overview of Deep Learningcited by 31
  12. 2022Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-makingcited by 14
  13. 2021XOmiVAE: an interpretable deep learning model for cancer classification using high-dimensional omics datacited by 13
  14. 2019Incorporating Biological Knowledge with Factor Graph Neural Network for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 5
  15. 2022Transformers and the representation of biomedical background knowledgecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

5 papers.