mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transformers and the representation of biomedical background knowledge

arXiv 2202.02432 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Specialised transformers-based models (such as BioBERT and BioMegatron) are adapted for the biomedical domain based on publicly available biomedical corpora. As such, they have the potential to encode large-scale biological knowledge. We investigate the encoding and representation of biological knowledge in these models, and its potential utility to support inference in cancer precision medicine - namely, the interpretation of the clinical significance of genomic alterations. We compare the performance of different transformer baselines; we use probing to determine the consistency of encodings for distinct entities; and we use clustering methods to compare and contrast the internal properties of the embeddings for genes, variants, drugs and diseases. We show that these models do indeed encode biological knowledge, although some of this is lost in fine-tuning for specific tasks. Finally, we analyse how the models behave with regard to biases and imbalances in the dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2022.

Builds on

27 of 53 references.

References · 27

  1. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
  2. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  3. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
  4. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  5. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  6. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  7. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  8. 2021Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recallcited by 291
  9. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  10. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
  11. 2020What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?cited by 113
  12. 2017Accelerated Hierarchical Density Clusteringcited by 100
15 more
  1. 2021Pre-trained Language Models in Biomedical Domain: A Systematic Surveycited by 87
  2. 2020Syntactic Data Augmentation Increases Robustness to Inference Heuristicscited by 85
  3. 2020BERTology Meets Biology: Interpreting Attention in Protein Language Modelscited by 85
  4. 2020BioMegatron: Larger Biomedical Domain Language Modelcited by 76
  5. 2020Do Language Embeddings Capture Scales?cited by 63
  6. 2019Document-Level N-ary Relation Extraction with Multiscale Representation Learningcited by 52
  7. 2019Probing Biomedical Embeddings from Language Modelscited by 39
  8. 2021Improving Biomedical Pretrained Language Models with Knowledgecited by 36
  9. 2021How transfer learning impacts linguistic knowledge in deep NLP models?cited by 32
  10. 2021Combining pre-trained language models and structured knowledgecited by 25
  11. 2021How Does Fine-tuning Affect the Geometry of Embedding Space: A Case Study on Isotropycited by 23
  12. 2021Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Disease Knowledgecited by 10
  13. 2018Deep Probabilistic Logic: A Unifying Framework for Indirect Supervisioncited by 9
  14. 2021Does My Representation Capture X? Probe-Ablycited by 8
  15. 2022Do Transformers Encode a Foundational Ontology? Probing Abstract Classes in Natural Languagecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.