mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing the Effects of Hyperparameters on Knowledge Graph Embedding Quality

arXiv 2207.00473 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2022cs.AI cs.CL cs.SIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Embedding knowledge graphs into low-dimensional spaces is a popular method for applying approaches, such as link prediction or node classification, to these databases. This embedding process is very costly in terms of both computational time and space. Part of the reason for this is the optimisation of hyperparameters, which involves repeatedly sampling, by random, guided, or brute-force selection, from a large hyperparameter space and testing the resulting embeddings for their quality. However, not all hyperparameters in this search space will be equally important. In fact, with prior knowledge of the relative importance of the hyperparameters, some could be eliminated from the search altogether without significantly impacting the overall quality of the outputted embeddings. To this end, we ran a Sobol sensitivity analysis to evaluate the effects of tuning different hyperparameters on the variance of embedding quality. This was achieved by performing thousands of embedding trials, each time measuring the quality of embeddings produced by different hyperparameter configurations. We regressed the embedding quality on those hyperparameter configurations, using this model to generate Sobol sensitivity indices for each of the hyperparameters. By evaluating the correlation between Sobol indices, we find substantial variability in the hyperparameter sensitivities between knowledge graphs, with differing dataset characteristics being the probable cause of these inconsistencies. As an additional contribution of this work we identify several relations in the UMLS knowledge graph that may cause data leakage via inverse relations, and derive and present UMLS-43, a leakage-robust variant of that graph.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2022.

Builds on

12 of 32 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 897
  2. 2017Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 729
  3. 2018Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completioncited by 150
  4. 2020Knowledge Graph Embedding for Link Prediction: A Comparative Analysiscited by 85
  5. 2020DGL-KE: Training Knowledge Graph Embeddings at Scalecited by 67
  6. 2020HittER: Hierarchical Transformers for Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 54
  7. 2017Knowledge Base Completion: Baselines Strike Backcited by 39
  8. 2019Fast and Accurate Network Embeddings via Very Sparse Random Projectioncited by 29
  9. 2018Billion-scale Network Embedding with Iterative Random Projectioncited by 25
  10. 2021Efficient Non-Sampling Knowledge Graph Embeddingcited by 14
  11. 2021Highly Efficient Knowledge Graph Embedding Learning with Orthogonal Procrustes Analysiscited by 10
  12. 2021Understanding the network formation pattern for better link predictioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.