mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Explaining the root causes of unit-level changes

arXiv 2206.12986 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing methods of explainable AI and interpretable ML cannot explain change in the values of an output variable for a statistical unit in terms of the change in the input values and the change in the "mechanism" (the function transforming input to output). We propose two methods based on counterfactuals for explaining unit-level changes at various input granularities using the concept of Shapley values from game theory. These methods satisfy two key axioms desirable for any unit-level change attribution method. Through simulations, we study the reliability and the scalability of the proposed methods. We get sensible results from a case study on identifying the drivers of the change in the earnings for individuals in the US.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2022.

Builds on

14 of 27 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,368
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,729
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,455
  6. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 343
  7. 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
  8. 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 166
  9. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  10. 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
  11. 2013Counterfactual Probabilities: Computational Methods, Bounds and Applicationscited by 67
  12. 2019Understanding Neural Networks via Feature Visualization: A surveycited by 65
2 more
  1. 2020Robust and Stable Black Box Explanationscited by 47
  2. 2021Why did the distribution change?cited by 37

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.