Efficient End-to-End AutoML via Scalable Search Space Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
End-to-end AutoML has attracted intensive interests from both academia and industry which automatically searches for ML pipelines in a space induced by feature engineering, algorithm/model selection, and hyper-parameter tuning. Existing AutoML systems, however, suffer from scalability issues when applying to application domains with large, high-dimensional search spaces. We present VolcanoML, a scalable and extensible framework that facilitates systematic exploration of large AutoML search spaces. VolcanoML introduces and implements basic building blocks that decompose a large search space into smaller ones, and allows users to utilize these building blocks to compose an execution plan for the AutoML problem at hand. VolcanoML further supports a Volcano-style execution model -- akin to the one supported by modern database systems -- to execute the plan constructed. Our evaluation demonstrates that, not only does VolcanoML raise the level of expressiveness for search space decomposition in AutoML, it also leads to actual findings of decomposition strategies that are significantly more efficient than the ones employed by state-of-the-art AutoML systems such as auto-sklearn. This paper is the extended version of the initial VolcanoML paper appeared in VLDB 2021.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2022.
Builds on
42 of 108 references.
References · 42
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
- 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
- 2017Progressive Neural Architecture Searchcited by 483
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
- 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
- 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
- 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 254
- 2015Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 219
- 2016Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasetscited by 131
- 2017Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimisation with Continuous Approximationscited by 120
30 more
- 2019Practical Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 91
- 2016Multi-Information Source Optimizationcited by 83
- 2017HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inferencecited by 79
- 2017Feature Engineering for Predictive Modeling using Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
- 2017Hyperparameter Importance Across Datasetscited by 62
- 2018Automated Machine Learning: From Principles to Practicescited by 62
- 2017Rotting Banditscited by 57
- 2019An ADMM Based Framework for AutoML Pipeline Configurationcited by 47
- 2021OpenBox: A Generalized Black-box Optimization Servicecited by 46
- 2020Efficient Automatic CASH via Rising Banditscited by 30
- 2019ZeroER: Entity Resolution using Zero Labeled Examplescited by 28
- 2017Generative Adversarial Networks recover features in astrophysical images of galaxies beyond the deconvolution limitcited by 26
- 2021AlphaD3M: Machine Learning Pipeline Synthesiscited by 24
- 2021Facilitating Database Tuning with Hyper-Parameter Optimization: A Comprehensive Experimental Evaluationcited by 22
- 2019Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization with Max-value Entropy Search and its parallelizationcited by 19
- 2019SystemDS: A Declarative Machine Learning System for the End-to-End Data Science Lifecyclecited by 19
- 2018Autostacker: A Compositional Evolutionary Learning Systemcited by 18
- 2019Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworkscited by 18
- 2020MFES-HB: Efficient Hyperband with Multi-Fidelity Quality Measurementscited by 18
- 2017Ease.ml: Towards Multi-tenant Resource Sharing for Machine Learning Workloadscited by 16
- 2020Complaint-driven Training Data Debugging for Query 2.0cited by 16
- 2022Towards Dynamic and Safe Configuration Tuning for Cloud Databasescited by 16
- 2021A Survey on Advancing the DBMS Query Optimizer: Cardinality Estimation, Cost Model, and Plan Enumerationcited by 14
- 2013Bucket Elimination: A Unifying Framework for Several Probabilistic Inferencecited by 13
- 2019The Machine Learning Bazaar: Harnessing the ML Ecosystem for Effective System Developmentcited by 13
- 2022Hyper-Tune: Towards Efficient Hyper-parameter Tuning at Scalecited by 13
- 2022Transfer Learning based Search Space Design for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 13
- 2018Noisy Blackbox Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Queries: A Tree Search Approachcited by 9
- 2022TransBO: Hyperparameter Optimization via Two-Phase Transfer Learningcited by 7
- 2021Automated Hyperparameter Optimization Challenge at CIKM 2021 AnalyticCupcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.