mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MFES-HB: Efficient Hyperband with Multi-Fidelity Quality Measurements

arXiv 2012.03011 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2020cs.LGcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) is a fundamental problem in automatic machine learning (AutoML). However, due to the expensive evaluation cost of models (e.g., training deep learning models or training models on large datasets), vanilla Bayesian optimization (BO) is typically computationally infeasible. To alleviate this issue, Hyperband (HB) utilizes the early stopping mechanism to speed up configuration evaluations by terminating those badly-performing configurations in advance. This leads to two kinds of quality measurements: (1) many low-fidelity measurements for configurations that get early-stopped, and (2) few high-fidelity measurements for configurations that are evaluated without being early stopped. The state-of-the-art HB-style method, BOHB, aims to combine the benefits of both BO and HB. Instead of sampling configurations randomly in HB, BOHB samples configurations based on a BO surrogate model, which is constructed with the high-fidelity measurements only. However, the scarcity of high-fidelity measurements greatly hampers the efficiency of BO to guide the configuration search. In this paper, we present MFES-HB, an efficient Hyperband method that is capable of utilizing both the high-fidelity and low-fidelity measurements to accelerate the convergence of HPO tasks. Designing MFES-HB is not trivial as the low-fidelity measurements can be biased yet informative to guide the configuration search. Thus we propose to build a Multi- Fidelity Ensemble Surrogate (MFES) based on the generalized Product of Experts framework, which can integrate useful information from multi-fidelity measurements effectively. The empirical studies on the real-world AutoML tasks demonstrate that MFES-HB can achieve 3.3-8.9x speedups over the state-of-the-art approach - BOHB.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021OpenBox: A Generalized Black-box Optimization Servicecited by 46
  2. 2022PaSca: a Graph Neural Architecture Search System under the Scalable Paradigmcited by 37
  3. 2023Transfer Learning for Bayesian Optimization: A Surveycited by 27
  4. 2021VolcanoML: Speeding up End-to-End AutoML via Scalable Search Space Decompositioncited by 25
  5. 2021ProxyBO: Accelerating Neural Architecture Search via Bayesian Optimization with Zero-cost Proxiescited by 20
  6. 2022Hyper-Tune: Towards Efficient Hyper-parameter Tuning at Scalecited by 13
  7. 2022Transfer Learning based Search Space Design for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 13
  8. 2025Distilled Lifelong Self-Adaptation for Configurable Systemscited by 11
  9. 2023OpenBox: A Python Toolkit for Generalized Black-box Optimizationcited by 9
  10. 2022TransBO: Hyperparameter Optimization via Two-Phase Transfer Learningcited by 7
  11. 2023DivBO: Diversity-aware CASH for Ensemble Learningcited by 6
  12. 2024Multi-Fidelity Methods for Optimization: A Surveycited by 5
6 more
  1. 2021Amortized Auto-Tuning: Cost-Efficient Bayesian Transfer Optimization for Hyperparameter Recommendationcited by 4
  2. 2022Efficient End-to-End AutoML via Scalable Search Space Decompositioncited by 0
  3. 2024Regularized boosting with an increasing coefficient magnitude stop criterion as meta-learner in hyperparameter optimization stacking ensemblecited by 0
  4. 2024FlexHB: a More Efficient and Flexible Framework for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 0
  5. 2025POCAII: Parameter Optimization with Conscious Allocation using Iterative Intelligencecited by 0
  6. 2026CoFEH: LLM-driven Feature Engineering Empowered by Collaborative Bayesian Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 0