Generalised Policy Improvement with Geometric Policy Composition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a method for policy improvement that interpolates between the greedy approach of value-based reinforcement learning (RL) and the full planning approach typical of model-based RL. The new method builds on the concept of a geometric horizon model (GHM, also known as a gamma-model), which models the discounted state-visitation distribution of a given policy. We show that we can evaluate any non-Markov policy that switches between a set of base Markov policies with fixed probability by a careful composition of the base policy GHMs, without any additional learning. We can then apply generalised policy improvement (GPI) to collections of such non-Markov policies to obtain a new Markov policy that will in general outperform its precursors. We provide a thorough theoretical analysis of this approach, develop applications to transfer and standard RL, and empirically demonstrate its effectiveness over standard GPI on a challenging deep RL continuous control task. We also provide an analysis of GHM training methods, proving a novel convergence result regarding previously proposed methods and showing how to train these models stably in deep RL settings.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2022.
Builds on
37 of 94 references.
References · 37
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
25 more
- 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
- 2016Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 282
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2019Fast Task Inference with Variational Intrinsic Successor Featurescited by 131
- 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 110
- 2017A Laplacian Framework for Option Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
- 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 102
- 2020C-Learning: Learning to Achieve Goals via Recursive Classificationcited by 99
- 2018Temporal Difference Models: Model-Free Deep RL for Model-Based Controlcited by 89
- 2019Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning Using Successor Features and Generalised Policy Improvementcited by 88
- 2016Deep Successor Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
- 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 67
- 2021The Option Keyboard: Combining Skills in Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2017When Waiting is not an Option : Learning Options with a Deliberation Costcited by 57
- 2020Data-efficient Hindsight Off-policy Option Learningcited by 31
- 2019The Termination Criticcited by 24
- 2021Discovering a set of policies for the worst case rewardcited by 21
- 2018Beyond the One Step Greedy Approach in Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2021A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Marginalized Importance Sampling with the Successor Representationcited by 19
- 2018How to Combine Tree-Search Methods in Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2021Constructing a Good Behavior Basis for Transfer using Generalized Policy Updatescited by 14
- 2019Disentangled Cumulants Help Successor Representations Transfer to New Taskscited by 11
- 2021Improve Agents without Retraining: Parallel Tree Search with Off-Policy Correctioncited by 10
- 2018Multiple-Step Greedy Policies in Online and Approximate Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2013Monte-Carlo Planning: Theoretically Fast Convergence Meets Practical Efficiencycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025Temporal Difference Flowscited by 20
- 2024A Distributional Analogue to the Successor Representationcited by 15
- 2023Bootstrapped Representations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2025Intention-Conditioned Flow Occupancy Modelscited by 7
- 2025Towards Robust Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2024Predictive representations: building blocks of intelligencecited by 4
- 2026Compositional Planning with Jumpy World Modelscited by 4
- 2025Constructing an Optimal Behavior Basis for the Option Keyboardcited by 2
- 2026Offline Reinforcement Learning with Universal Horizon Modelscited by 1
- 2022Minimum Description Length Controlcited by 0
- 2026Switching Successor Measures for Hierarchical Zero-shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Offline Reinforcement Learning with Universal Horizon Models15 May 2026
- 2026Switching Successor Measures for Hierarchical Zero-shot Reinforcement Learning13 May 2026
- 2026Compositional Planning with Jumpy World Models23 Feb 2026
- 2025Towards Robust Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning17 Oct 2025
- 2025Intention-Conditioned Flow Occupancy Models10 Jun 2025
- 2025Constructing an Optimal Behavior Basis for the Option Keyboard1 May 2025
- 2025Temporal Difference Flows12 Mar 2025
- 2024A Distributional Analogue to the Successor Representation13 Feb 2024
- 2024Predictive representations: building blocks of intelligence9 Feb 2024
- 2023Bootstrapped Representations in Reinforcement Learning16 Jun 2023
- 2022Minimum Description Length Control17 Jul 2022