Metric-Fair Classifier Derandomization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of classifier derandomization in machine learning: given a stochastic binary classifier f: X → [0,1], sample a deterministic classifier hatf: X → 0,1 that approximates the output of f in aggregate over any data distribution. Recent work revealed how to efficiently derandomize a stochastic classifier with strong output approximation guarantees, but at the cost of individual fairness -- that is, if f treated similar inputs similarly, hatf did not. In this paper, we initiate a systematic study of classifier derandomization with metric fairness guarantees. We show that the prior derandomization approach is almost maximally metric-unfair, and that a simple ``random threshold'' derandomization achieves optimal fairness preservation but with weaker output approximation. We then devise a derandomization procedure that provides an appealing tradeoff between these two: if f is α-metric fair according to a metric d with a locality-sensitive hash (LSH) family, then our derandomized hatf is, with high probability, O(α)-metric fair and a close approximation of f. We also prove generic results applicable to all (fair and unfair) classifier derandomization procedures, including a bias-variance decomposition and reductions between various notions of metric fairness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2022.
Builds on
16 of 39 references.
References · 16
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 257
- 2017Strategic Classification from Revealed Preferencescited by 128
- 2018Fairness Through Computationally-Bounded Awarenesscited by 55
- 2019Average Individual Fairness: Algorithms, Generalization and Experimentscited by 46
- 2015Optimal Data-Dependent Hashing for Approximate Near Neighborscited by 44
- 2020The Role of Randomness and Noise in Strategic Classificationcited by 40
- 2020Randomization matters. How to defend against strong adversarial attackscited by 37
- 2019Theoretical evidence for adversarial robustness through randomizationcited by 33
- 2018Probably Approximately Metric-Fair Learningcited by 29
- 2014Optimum Statistical Estimation with Strategic Data Sourcescited by 28
4 more
- 2013Beyond Locality-Sensitive Hashingcited by 23
- 2018Strategyproof Linear Regression in High Dimensionscited by 22
- 2017On Fairness, Diversity and Randomness in Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 17
- 2020Linear Classifiers that Encourage Constructive Adaptationcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.