mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Fairness, Diversity and Randomness in Algorithmic Decision Making

arXiv 1706.10208 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2017stat.ML cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Consider a binary decision making process where a single machine learning classifier replaces a multitude of humans. We raise questions about the resulting loss of diversity in the decision making process. We study the potential benefits of using random classifier ensembles instead of a single classifier in the context of fairness-aware learning and demonstrate various attractive properties: (i) an ensemble of fair classifiers is guaranteed to be fair, for several different measures of fairness, (ii) an ensemble of unfair classifiers can still achieve fair outcomes, and (iii) an ensemble of classifiers can achieve better accuracy-fairness trade-offs than a single classifier. Finally, we introduce notions of distributional fairness to characterize further potential benefits of random classifier ensembles.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 8; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: