mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Leakage from Model in Federated Learning

arXiv 2206.04887 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distributed machine learning has been widely used in recent years to tackle the large and complex dataset problem. Therewith, the security of distributed learning has also drawn increasing attentions from both academia and industry. In this context, federated learning (FL) was developed as a "secure" distributed learning by maintaining private training data locally and only public model gradients are communicated between. However, to date, a variety of gradient leakage attacks have been proposed for this procedure and prove that it is insecure. For instance, a common drawback of these attacks is shared: they require too much auxiliary information such as model weights, optimizers, and some hyperparameters (e.g., learning rate), which are difficult to obtain in real situations. Moreover, many existing algorithms avoid transmitting model gradients in FL and turn to sending model weights, such as FedAvg, but few people consider its security breach. In this paper, we present two novel frameworks to demonstrate that transmitting model weights is also likely to leak private local data of clients, i.e., (DLM and DLM+), under the FL scenario. In addition, a number of experiments are performed to illustrate the effect and generality of our attack frameworks. At the end of this paper, we also introduce two defenses to the proposed attacks and evaluate their protection effects. Comprehensively, the proposed attack and defense schemes can be applied to the general distributed learning scenario as well, just with some appropriate customization.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2022.

Builds on

17 of 35 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  5. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  6. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
  7. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  8. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  9. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
  10. 2020HeteroFL: Computation and Communication Efficient Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Clientscited by 334
  11. 2020Think Locally, Act Globally: Federated Learning with Local and Global Representationscited by 322
  12. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
5 more
  1. 2017Gradient Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimizationcited by 199
  2. 2021Federated Learning for Open Bankingcited by 138
  3. 2016A Multi-Batch L-BFGS Method for Machine Learningcited by 30
  4. 2021FedPAGE: A Fast Local Stochastic Gradient Method for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 19
  5. 2020Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent: Nonconvexity, Nonsmoothness, and Convergence to Local Minimacited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

9 papers.