Deep Leakage with Generative Flow Matching Denoiser
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for decentralized model training, yet it remains vulnerable to deep leakage (DL) attacks that reconstruct private client data from shared model updates. While prior DL methods have demonstrated varying levels of success, they often suffer from instability, limited fidelity, or poor robustness under realistic FL settings. We introduce a new DL attack that integrates a generative Flow Matching (FM) prior into the reconstruction process. By guiding optimization toward the distribution of realistic images (represented by a flow matching foundation model), our method enhances reconstruction fidelity without requiring knowledge of the private data. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets and target models demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art attacks across pixel-level, perceptual, and feature-based similarity metrics. Crucially, the method remains effective across different training epochs, larger client batch sizes, and under common defenses such as noise injection, clipping, and sparsification. Our findings call for the development of new defense strategies that explicitly account for adversaries equipped with powerful generative priors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 19 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.
Builds on
19 of 23 references.
References · 19
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2019Dreaming to Distill: Data-free Knowledge Transfer via DeepInversioncited by 419
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
- 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
- 2023Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learning with Communication Compressioncited by 100
- 2022Auditing Privacy Defenses in Federated Learning via Generative Gradient Leakagecited by 72
- 2021PRECODE - A Generic Model Extension to Prevent Deep Gradient Leakagecited by 28
7 more
- 2022Data Leakage in Federated Averagingcited by 26
- 2022Dropout is NOT All You Need to Prevent Gradient Leakagecited by 11
- 2023Surrogate Model Extension (SME): A Fast and Accurate Weight Update Attack on Federated Learningcited by 10
- 2022Deep Leakage from Model in Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2024FedStale: leveraging stale client updates in federated learningcited by 5
- 2021Bilateral Spectrum Weighted Total Variation for Noisy-Image Super-Resolution and Image Denoisingcited by 3
- 2024Exploring User-level Gradient Inversion with a Diffusion Priorcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025GUIDE: Enhancing Gradient Inversion Attacks in Federated Learning with Denoising Models
- 2025Federated Flow Matching
- 2025Enhanced Privacy Leakage from Noise-Perturbed Gradients via Gradient-Guided Conditional Diffusion Models
- 2026Training Flow Matching: The Role of Weighting and Parameterization
- 2026Where Flow Matching Leaks: Characterising Membership Signals Along the Interpolation Path
- 2024Gradient Inversion of Federated Diffusion Models
- 2026The Amazing Stability of Flow Matching
- 2025On the Closed-Form of Flow Matching: Generalization Does Not Arise from Target Stochasticity