mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent: Nonconvexity, Nonsmoothness, and Convergence to Local Minima

arXiv 2003.02818 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2020math.OCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In centralized settings, it is well known that stochastic gradient descent (SGD) avoids saddle points and converges to local minima in nonconvex problems. However, similar guarantees are lacking for distributed first-order algorithms. The paper studies distributed stochastic gradient descent (D-SGD)--a simple network-based implementation of SGD. Conditions under which D-SGD avoids saddle points and converges to local minima are studied. First, we consider the problem of computing critical points. Assuming loss functions are nonconvex and possibly nonsmooth, it is shown that, for each fixed initialization, D-SGD converges to critical points of the loss with probability one. Next, we consider the problem of avoiding saddle points. In this case, we again assume that loss functions may be nonconvex and nonsmooth, but are smooth in a neighborhood of a saddle point. It is shown that, for any fixed initialization, D-SGD avoids such saddle points with probability one. Results are proved by studying the underlying (distributed) gradient flow, using the ordinary differential equation (ODE) method of stochastic approximation, and extending classical techniques from dynamical systems theory such as stable manifolds. Results are proved in the general context of subspace-constrained optimization, of which D-SGD is a special case.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: