mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A General Framework For Proving The Equivariant Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis

arXiv 2206.04270 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (SLTH) stipulates the existence of a subnetwork within a sufficiently overparameterized (dense) neural network that -- when initialized randomly and without any training -- achieves the accuracy of a fully trained target network. Recent works by Da Cunha et. al 2022; Burkholz 2022 demonstrate that the SLTH can be extended to translation equivariant networks -- i.e. CNNs -- with the same level of overparametrization as needed for the SLTs in dense networks. However, modern neural networks are capable of incorporating more than just translation symmetry, and developing general equivariant architectures such as rotation and permutation has been a powerful design principle. In this paper, we generalize the SLTH to functions that preserve the action of the group G -- i.e. G-equivariant network -- and prove, with high probability, that one can approximate any G-equivariant network of fixed width and depth by pruning a randomly initialized overparametrized G-equivariant network to a G-equivariant subnetwork. We further prove that our prescribed overparametrization scheme is optimal and provides a lower bound on the number of effective parameters as a function of the error tolerance. We develop our theory for a large range of groups, including subgroups of the Euclidean E(2) and Symmetric group G ≤ Sn -- allowing us to find SLTs for MLPs, CNNs, E(2)-steerable CNNs, and permutation equivariant networks as specific instantiations of our unified framework. Empirically, we verify our theory by pruning overparametrized E(2)-steerable CNNs, k-order GNNs, and message passing GNNs to match the performance of trained target networks.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2022.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  2. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
  3. 2019General E(2)-Equivariant Steerable CNNscited by 441
  4. 2018Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networkscited by 339
  5. 2016Steerable CNNscited by 298
  6. 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 236
  7. 2018A General Theory of Equivariant CNNs on Homogeneous Spacescited by 223
  8. 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
  9. 2017Learning Steerable Filters for Rotation Equivariant CNNscited by 193
  10. 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
  11. 2020Logarithmic Pruning is All You Needcited by 71
  12. 2021On the Existence of Universal Lottery Ticketscited by 30
2 more
  1. 2022Most Activation Functions Can Win the Lottery Without Excessive Depthcited by 21
  2. 2022Convolutional and Residual Networks Provably Contain Lottery Ticketscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 8; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area: