mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Online Algorithms with Limited Data Retention

arXiv 2404.10997 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a model of online algorithms subject to strict constraints on data retention. An online learning algorithm encounters a stream of data points, one per round, generated by some stationary process. Crucially, each data point can request that it be removed from memory m rounds after it arrives. To model the impact of removal, we do not allow the algorithm to store any information or calculations between rounds other than a subset of the data points (subject to the retention constraints). At the conclusion of the stream, the algorithm answers a statistical query about the full dataset. We ask: what level of performance can be guaranteed as a function of m? We illustrate this framework for multidimensional mean estimation and linear regression problems. We show it is possible to obtain an exponential improvement over a baseline algorithm that retains all data as long as possible. Specifically, we show that m = textscPoly(d, log(1/ε)) retention suffices to achieve mean squared error ε after observing O(1/ε) d-dimensional data points. This matches the error bound of the optimal, yet infeasible, algorithm that retains all data forever. We also show a nearly matching lower bound on the retention required to guarantee error ε. One implication of our results is that data retention laws are insufficient to guarantee the right to be forgotten even in a non-adversarial world in which firms merely strive to (approximately) optimize the performance of their algorithms. Our approach makes use of recent developments in the multidimensional random subset sum problem to simulate the progression of stochastic gradient descent under a model of adversarial noise, which may be of independent interest.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2024.

Builds on

10 of 24 references.

References · 10

  1. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearningcited by 298
  2. 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
  3. 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 75
  4. 2020Formalizing Data Deletion in the Context of the Right to be Forgottencited by 46
  5. 2020Introduction to Core-sets: an Updated Surveycited by 45
  6. 2013A Statistical Perspective on Algorithmic Leveragingcited by 38
  7. 2022A General Framework For Proving The Equivariant Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 19
  8. 2018Gradient-based Sampling: An Adaptive Importance Sampling for Least-squarescited by 8
  9. 2022Control, Confidentiality, and the Right to be Forgottencited by 8
  10. 2022On the Multidimensional Random Subset Sum Problemcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.