mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantization vs Pruning: Insights from the Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis

arXiv 2508.11020 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantization is an essential technique for making neural networks more efficient, yet our theoretical understanding of it remains limited. Previous works demonstrated that extremely low-precision networks, such as binary networks, can be constructed by pruning large, randomly-initialized networks, and showed that the ratio between the size of the original and the pruned networks is at most polylogarithmic. The specific pruning method they employed inspired a line of theoretical work known as the Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (SLTH), which leverages insights from the Random Subset Sum Problem. However, these results primarily address the continuous setting and cannot be applied to extend SLTH results to the quantized setting. In this work, we build on foundational results by Borgs et al. on the Number Partitioning Problem to derive new theoretical results for the Random Subset Sum Problem in a quantized setting. Using these results, we then extend the SLTH framework to finite-precision networks. While prior work on SLTH showed that pruning allows approximation of a certain class of neural networks, we demonstrate that, in the quantized setting, the analogous class of target discrete neural networks can be represented exactly, and we prove optimal bounds on the necessary overparameterization of the initial network as a function of the precision of the target network.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2025.

Builds on

14 of 26 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  3. 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 237
  4. 2019Deconstructing Lottery Tickets: Zeros, Signs, and the Supermaskcited by 207
  5. 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
  6. 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
  7. 2019Pruning from Scratchcited by 72
  8. 2020Logarithmic Pruning is All You Needcited by 71
  9. 2021Multi-Prize Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Accurate Binary Neural Networks by Pruning A Randomly Weighted Networkcited by 55
  10. 2022Most Activation Functions Can Win the Lottery Without Excessive Depthcited by 21
  11. 2022A General Framework For Proving The Equivariant Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 19
  12. 2022Convolutional and Residual Networks Provably Contain Lottery Ticketscited by 16
2 more
  1. 2024On Expressive Power of Quantized Neural Networks under Fixed-Point Arithmeticcited by 4
  2. 2024On the Sparsity of the Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Efficient Multi-Prize Lottery Tickets: Enhanced Accuracy, Training, and Inference Speed
  2. 2022Coarsening the Granularity: Towards Structurally Sparse Lottery Tickets
  3. 2025Winning the Lottery by Preserving Network Training Dynamics with Concrete Ticket Search
  4. 2022Exploiting the Partly Scratch-off Lottery Ticket for Quantization-Aware Training
  5. 2025PQS (Prune, Quantize, and Sort): Low-Bitwidth Accumulation of Dot Products in Neural Network Computations
  6. 2021Ps and Qs: Quantization-aware pruning for efficient low latency neural network inference
  7. 2025Theoretical Compression Bounds for Wide Multilayer Perceptrons
  8. 2021Training Deep Neural Networks with Joint Quantization and Pruning of Weights and Activations