mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semantic and Expressive Variation in Image Captions Across Languages

arXiv 2310.14356 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.CL cs.CYcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer vision often treats human perception as homogeneous: an implicit assumption that visual stimuli are perceived similarly by everyone. This assumption is reflected in the way researchers collect datasets and train vision models. By contrast, literature in cross-cultural psychology and linguistics has provided evidence that people from different cultural backgrounds observe vastly different concepts even when viewing the same visual stimuli. In this paper, we study how these differences manifest themselves in vision-language datasets and models, using language as a proxy for culture. By comparing textual descriptions generated across 7 languages for the same images, we find significant differences in the semantic content and linguistic expression. When datasets are multilingual as opposed to monolingual, descriptions have higher semantic coverage on average, where coverage is measured using scene graphs, model embeddings, and linguistic taxonomies. For example, multilingual descriptions have on average 29.9% more objects, 24.5% more relations, and 46.0% more attributes than a set of monolingual captions. When prompted to describe images in different languages, popular models (e.g. LLaVA) inherit this bias and describe different parts of the image. Moreover, finetuning models on captions from one language performs best on corresponding test data from that language, while finetuning on multilingual data performs consistently well across all test data compositions. Our work points towards the need to account for and embrace the diversity of human perception in the computer vision community.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 130 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2023.

Builds on

60 of 130 references.

References · 60

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  6. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  7. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  8. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  9. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  10. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  11. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  12. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
38 more
  1. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  2. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 762
  3. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
  4. 2022GIT: A Generative Image-to-text Transformer for Vision and Languagecited by 536
  5. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  6. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  7. 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 416
  8. 2020Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Groundingcited by 401
  9. 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
  10. 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 275
  11. 2019Action Genome: Actions as Composition of Spatio-temporal Scene Graphscited by 249
  12. 2021Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and Culturescited by 188
  13. 2019Emerging Cross-lingual Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 180
  14. 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 172
  15. 2023Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysiscited by 156
  16. 2022Crossmodal-3600: A Massively Multilingual Multimodal Evaluation Datasetcited by 100
  17. 2021Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfarecited by 98
  18. 2022"This is my unicorn, Fluffy": Personalizing frozen vision-language representationscited by 95
  19. 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
  20. 2023NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Modelscited by 91
  21. 2022AltCLIP: Altering the Language Encoder in CLIP for Extended Language Capabilitiescited by 84
  22. 2020On the Language Neutrality of Pre-trained Multilingual Representationscited by 82
  23. 2018COCO-CN for Cross-Lingual Image Tagging, Captioning and Retrievalcited by 80
  24. 2021xGQA: Cross-Lingual Visual Question Answeringcited by 72
  25. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness of Ensembles with Diversity Trainingcited by 69
  26. 2023Leveraging GPT-4 for Automatic Translation Post-Editingcited by 56
  27. 2017STAIR Captions: Constructing a Large-Scale Japanese Image Caption Datasetcited by 47
  28. 2023mBLIP: Efficient Bootstrapping of Multilingual Vision-LLMscited by 41
  29. 2022Underspecification in Scene Description-to-Depiction Taskscited by 30
  30. 2023On the Connection between Pre-training Data Diversity and Fine-tuning Robustnesscited by 25
  31. 2022Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semanticscited by 24
  32. 2022There is a Time and Place for Reasoning Beyond the Imagecited by 22
  33. 2016Multimodal Pivots for Image Caption Translationcited by 18
  34. 2022ArtELingo: A Million Emotion Annotations of WikiArt with Emphasis on Diversity over Language and Culturecited by 17
  35. 2020(Re)construing Meaning in NLPcited by 16
  36. 2022Multilingual Multimodal Learning with Machine Translated Textcited by 16
  37. 2017Paying Attention to Descriptions Generated by Image Captioning Modelscited by 12
  38. 2023Towards Equitable Representation in Text-to-Image Synthesis Models with the Cross-Cultural Understanding Benchmark (CCUB) Datasetcited by 12

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

8 papers.