Semantic and Expressive Variation in Image Captions Across Languages
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computer vision often treats human perception as homogeneous: an implicit assumption that visual stimuli are perceived similarly by everyone. This assumption is reflected in the way researchers collect datasets and train vision models. By contrast, literature in cross-cultural psychology and linguistics has provided evidence that people from different cultural backgrounds observe vastly different concepts even when viewing the same visual stimuli. In this paper, we study how these differences manifest themselves in vision-language datasets and models, using language as a proxy for culture. By comparing textual descriptions generated across 7 languages for the same images, we find significant differences in the semantic content and linguistic expression. When datasets are multilingual as opposed to monolingual, descriptions have higher semantic coverage on average, where coverage is measured using scene graphs, model embeddings, and linguistic taxonomies. For example, multilingual descriptions have on average 29.9% more objects, 24.5% more relations, and 46.0% more attributes than a set of monolingual captions. When prompted to describe images in different languages, popular models (e.g. LLaVA) inherit this bias and describe different parts of the image. Moreover, finetuning models on captions from one language performs best on corresponding test data from that language, while finetuning on multilingual data performs consistently well across all test data compositions. Our work points towards the need to account for and embrace the diversity of human perception in the computer vision community.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 130 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2023.
Builds on
60 of 130 references.
References · 60
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
- 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
38 more
- 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
- 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 762
- 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
- 2022GIT: A Generative Image-to-text Transformer for Vision and Languagecited by 536
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
- 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 416
- 2020Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Groundingcited by 401
- 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
- 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 275
- 2019Action Genome: Actions as Composition of Spatio-temporal Scene Graphscited by 249
- 2021Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and Culturescited by 188
- 2019Emerging Cross-lingual Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 180
- 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 172
- 2023Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysiscited by 156
- 2022Crossmodal-3600: A Massively Multilingual Multimodal Evaluation Datasetcited by 100
- 2021Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfarecited by 98
- 2022"This is my unicorn, Fluffy": Personalizing frozen vision-language representationscited by 95
- 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
- 2023NLPositionality: Characterizing Design Biases of Datasets and Modelscited by 91
- 2022AltCLIP: Altering the Language Encoder in CLIP for Extended Language Capabilitiescited by 84
- 2020On the Language Neutrality of Pre-trained Multilingual Representationscited by 82
- 2018COCO-CN for Cross-Lingual Image Tagging, Captioning and Retrievalcited by 80
- 2021xGQA: Cross-Lingual Visual Question Answeringcited by 72
- 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness of Ensembles with Diversity Trainingcited by 69
- 2023Leveraging GPT-4 for Automatic Translation Post-Editingcited by 56
- 2017STAIR Captions: Constructing a Large-Scale Japanese Image Caption Datasetcited by 47
- 2023mBLIP: Efficient Bootstrapping of Multilingual Vision-LLMscited by 41
- 2022Underspecification in Scene Description-to-Depiction Taskscited by 30
- 2023On the Connection between Pre-training Data Diversity and Fine-tuning Robustnesscited by 25
- 2022Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semanticscited by 24
- 2022There is a Time and Place for Reasoning Beyond the Imagecited by 22
- 2016Multimodal Pivots for Image Caption Translationcited by 18
- 2022ArtELingo: A Million Emotion Annotations of WikiArt with Emphasis on Diversity over Language and Culturecited by 17
- 2020(Re)construing Meaning in NLPcited by 16
- 2022Multilingual Multimodal Learning with Machine Translated Textcited by 16
- 2017Paying Attention to Descriptions Generated by Image Captioning Modelscited by 12
- 2023Towards Equitable Representation in Text-to-Image Synthesis Models with the Cross-Cultural Understanding Benchmark (CCUB) Datasetcited by 12
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Exploring Visual Culture Awareness in GPT-4V: A Comprehensive Probingcited by 12
- 2024Vision-Language Models under Cultural and Inclusive Considerationscited by 8
- 2024Multi3Hate: Multimodal, Multilingual, and Multicultural Hate Speech Detection with Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
- 2024No Detail Left Behind: Revisiting Self-Retrieval for Fine-Grained Image Captioningcited by 5
- 2025World in a Frame: Understanding Culture Mixing as a New Challenge for Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024A Grounded Typology of Word Classescited by 2
- 2026Scale Can't Overcome Pragmatics: The Impact of Reporting Bias on Vision-Language Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Interrogating Design Homogenization in Web Vibe Codingcited by 1
- 2026Interrogating Design Homogenization in Web Vibe Coding13 Mar 2026
- 2026Scale Can't Overcome Pragmatics: The Impact of Reporting Bias on Vision-Language Reasoning26 Feb 2026
- 2025World in a Frame: Understanding Culture Mixing as a New Challenge for Vision-Language Models27 Nov 2025
- 2024A Grounded Typology of Word Classes13 Dec 2024
- 2024Multi3Hate: Multimodal, Multilingual, and Multicultural Hate Speech Detection with Vision-Language Models6 Nov 2024
- 2024No Detail Left Behind: Revisiting Self-Retrieval for Fine-Grained Image Captioning4 Sep 2024
- 2024Vision-Language Models under Cultural and Inclusive Considerations8 Jul 2024
- 2024Exploring Visual Culture Awareness in GPT-4V: A Comprehensive Probing8 Feb 2024