mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Training Feature Attribution for Vision Models

arXiv 2510.09135 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks are often considered opaque systems, prompting the need for explainability methods to improve trust and accountability. Existing approaches typically attribute test-time predictions either to input features (e.g., pixels in an image) or to influential training examples. We argue that both perspectives should be studied jointly. This work explores *training feature attribution*, which links test predictions to specific regions of specific training images and thereby provides new insights into the inner workings of deep models. Our experiments on vision datasets show that training feature attribution yields fine-grained, test-specific explanations: it identifies harmful examples that drive misclassifications and reveals spurious correlations, such as patch-based shortcuts, that conventional attribution methods fail to expose.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

32 of 46 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  7. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  11. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  12. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
20 more
  1. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  2. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  3. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  4. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  6. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  7. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
  8. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
  9. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  10. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  11. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
  12. 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
  13. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
  14. 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
  15. 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
  16. 2021Input Similarity from the Neural Network Perspectivecited by 79
  17. 2021Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifactscited by 38
  18. 2023Natural Example-Based Explainability: a Surveycited by 13
  19. 2024Visual-TCAV: Concept-based Attribution and Saliency Maps for Post-hoc Explainability in Image Classificationcited by 12
  20. 2022Saliency Cards: A Framework to Characterize and Compare Saliency Methodscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.