mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Certifying Some Distributional Fairness with Subpopulation Decomposition

arXiv 2205.15494 ↗First posted 31 May 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Extensive efforts have been made to understand and improve the fairness of machine learning models based on observational metrics, especially in high-stakes domains such as medical insurance, education, and hiring decisions. However, there is a lack of certified fairness considering the end-to-end performance of an ML model. In this paper, we first formulate the certified fairness of an ML model trained on a given data distribution as an optimization problem based on the model performance loss bound on a fairness constrained distribution, which is within bounded distributional distance with the training distribution. We then propose a general fairness certification framework and instantiate it for both sensitive shifting and general shifting scenarios. In particular, we propose to solve the optimization problem by decomposing the original data distribution into analytical subpopulations and proving the convexity of the subproblems to solve them. We evaluate our certified fairness on six real-world datasets and show that our certification is tight in the sensitive shifting scenario and provides non-trivial certification under general shifting. Our framework is flexible to integrate additional non-skewness constraints and we show that it provides even tighter certification under different real-world scenarios. We also compare our certified fairness bound with adapted existing distributional robustness bounds on Gaussian data and demonstrate that our method is significantly tighter.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2022.

Builds on

34 of 67 references.

References · 34

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  5. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  6. 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 337
  7. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  8. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  9. 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
  10. 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 192
  11. 2016Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approachcited by 183
  12. 2016Variance-based regularization with convex objectivescited by 155
22 more
  1. 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
  2. 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
  3. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  4. 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
  5. 2019Conditional Learning of Fair Representationscited by 78
  6. 2020Fairness by Learning Orthogonal Disentangled Representationscited by 76
  7. 2020Learning Certified Individually Fair Representationscited by 69
  8. 2020How Do Fair Decisions Fare in Long-term Qualification?cited by 60
  9. 2020Verifying Individual Fairness in Machine Learning Modelscited by 49
  10. 2021Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 48
  11. 2018Probabilistic Verification of Fairness Properties via Concentrationcited by 45
  12. 2019Perfectly Parallel Fairness Certification of Neural Networkscited by 42
  13. 2021Fair Normalizing Flowscited by 38
  14. 2020Does enforcing fairness mitigate biases caused by subpopulation shift?cited by 25
  15. 2021Adaptive Sampling for Minimax Fair Classificationcited by 24
  16. 2020Group Fairness by Probabilistic Modeling with Latent Fair Decisionscited by 22
  17. 2021Unintended Selection: Persistent Qualification Rate Disparities and Interventionscited by 18
  18. 2021Latent Space Smoothing for Individually Fair Representationscited by 18
  19. 2020Individual Fairness Revisited: Transferring Techniques from Adversarial Robustnesscited by 17
  20. 2020Null-sampling for Interpretable and Fair Representationscited by 16
  21. 2020Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Modelscited by 16
  22. 2022Certifying Out-of-Domain Generalization for Blackbox Functionscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 3.

11 papers.