COMMIT: Certifying Robustness of Multi-Sensor Fusion Systems against Semantic Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-sensor fusion systems (MSFs) play a vital role as the perception module in modern autonomous vehicles (AVs). Therefore, ensuring their robustness against common and realistic adversarial semantic transformations, such as rotation and shifting in the physical world, is crucial for the safety of AVs. While empirical evidence suggests that MSFs exhibit improved robustness compared to single-modal models, they are still vulnerable to adversarial semantic transformations. Despite the proposal of empirical defenses, several works show that these defenses can be attacked again by new adaptive attacks. So far, there is no certified defense proposed for MSFs. In this work, we propose the first robustness certification framework COMMIT certify robustness of multi-sensor fusion systems against semantic attacks. In particular, we propose a practical anisotropic noise mechanism that leverages randomized smoothing with multi-modal data and performs a grid-based splitting method to characterize complex semantic transformations. We also propose efficient algorithms to compute the certification in terms of object detection accuracy and IoU for large-scale MSF models. Empirically, we evaluate the efficacy of COMMIT in different settings and provide a comprehensive benchmark of certified robustness for different MSF models using the CARLA simulation platform. We show that the certification for MSF models is at most 48.39% higher than that of single-modal models, which validates the advantages of MSF models. We believe our certification framework and benchmark will contribute an important step towards certifiably robust AVs in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2024.
Builds on
49 of 56 references.
References · 49
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
- 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
- 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
37 more
- 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 721
- 2017Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Datacited by 640
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
- 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
- 2017ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Imagescited by 261
- 2020Fast and Furious: Real Time End-to-End 3D Detection, Tracking and Motion Forecasting with a Single Convolutional Netcited by 228
- 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
- 2020CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 147
- 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 146
- 2022Focal Sparse Convolutional Networks for 3D Object Detectioncited by 142
- 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 130
- 2022General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verificationcited by 102
- 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
- 2020SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 100
- 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
- 2018Semantic Adversarial Examplescited by 86
- 2021Skew Orthogonal Convolutionscited by 67
- 2021Learning Auxiliary Monocular Contexts Helps Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 66
- 2020TSS: Transformation-Specific Smoothing for Robustness Certificationcited by 49
- 2022Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function Perspectivecited by 48
- 2020Detection as Regression: Certified Object Detection by Median Smoothingcited by 47
- 2021Boosting Randomized Smoothing with Variance Reduced Classifierscited by 47
- 2020Certifying Confidence via Randomized Smoothingcited by 36
- 2021KITTI-CARLA: a KITTI-like dataset generated by CARLA Simulatorcited by 33
- 2022LOT: Layer-wise Orthogonal Training on Improving ℓ2 Certified Robustnesscited by 32
- 2021Security Analysis of Camera-LiDAR Fusion Against Black-Box Attacks on Autonomous Vehiclescited by 26
- 2022SoK: On the Semantic AI Security in Autonomous Drivingcited by 22
- 2022Double Sampling Randomized Smoothingcited by 22
- 2020Breaking certified defenses: Semantic adversarial examples with spoofed robustness certificatescited by 17
- 2022Certifying Some Distributional Fairness with Subpopulation Decompositioncited by 11
- 2022TPC: Transformation-Specific Smoothing for Point Cloud Modelscited by 10
- 2022PointCAT: Contrastive Adversarial Training for Robust Point Cloud Recognitioncited by 10
- 2021Detecting Multi-Sensor Fusion Errors in Advanced Driver-Assistance Systemscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.