mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Variance-Aware Sparse Linear Bandits

arXiv 2205.13450 ↗First posted 26 May 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is well-known that for sparse linear bandits, when ignoring the dependency on sparsity which is much smaller than the ambient dimension, the worst-case minimax regret is widetildeThetaleft(√dTright) where d is the ambient dimension and T is the number of rounds. On the other hand, in the benign setting where there is no noise and the action set is the unit sphere, one can use divide-and-conquer to achieve widetildemathcal O(1) regret, which is (nearly) independent of d and T. In this paper, we present the first variance-aware regret guarantee for sparse linear bandits: widetildemathcal Oleft(√dsumt=1T σt2 + 1right), where σt2 is the variance of the noise at the t-th round. This bound naturally interpolates the regret bounds for the worst-case constant-variance regime (i.e., σt equiv Omega(1)) and the benign deterministic regimes (i.e., σt equiv 0). To achieve this variance-aware regret guarantee, we develop a general framework that converts any variance-aware linear bandit algorithm to a variance-aware algorithm for sparse linear bandits in a "black-box" manner. Specifically, we take two recent algorithms as black boxes to illustrate that the claimed bounds indeed hold, where the first algorithm can handle unknown-variance cases and the second one is more efficient.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2022.

Builds on

24 of 58 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  2. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 485
  3. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 199
  4. 2019Tighter Problem-Dependent Regret Bounds in Reinforcement Learning without Domain Knowledge using Value Function Boundscited by 194
  5. 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 146
  6. 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
  7. 2014Best-Arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 98
  8. 2018Information Directed Sampling and Bandits with Heteroscedastic Noisecited by 75
  9. 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
  10. 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
  11. 2020High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Banditscited by 61
  12. 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
12 more
  1. 2019Doubly-Robust Lasso Banditcited by 49
  2. 2021Improved Variance-Aware Confidence Sets for Linear Bandits and Linear Mixture MDPcited by 45
  3. 2020Sparsity-Agnostic Lasso Banditcited by 44
  4. 2021Improved Regret Analysis for Variance-Adaptive Linear Bandits and Horizon-Free Linear Mixture MDPscited by 44
  5. 2021Provable Model-based Nonlinear Bandit and Reinforcement Learning: Shelve Optimism, Embrace Virtual Curvaturecited by 32
  6. 2020Dynamic Batch Learning in High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Contextual Banditscited by 28
  7. 2020Online Sparse Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  8. 2021Information Directed Sampling for Sparse Linear Banditscited by 20
  9. 2019Tight Regret Bounds for Infinite-armed Linear Contextual Banditscited by 17
  10. 2020Thresholded Lasso Banditcited by 16
  11. 2022Almost Optimal Variance-Constrained Best Arm Identificationcited by 16
  12. 2020Nearly Dimension-Independent Sparse Linear Bandit over Small Action Spaces via Best Subset Selectioncited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

11 papers.