Variance-Dependent Regret Lower Bounds for Contextual Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Variance-dependent regret bounds for linear contextual bandits, which improve upon the classical tildeO(d√K) regret bound to tildeO(d√sumk=1Kσk2), where d is the context dimension, K is the number of rounds, and σ2k is the noise variance in round k, has been widely studied in recent years. However, most existing works focus on the regret upper bounds instead of lower bounds. To our knowledge, the only lower bound is from Jia et al. (2024), which proved that for any eluder dimension delu and total variance budget Lambda, there exists an instance with sumk=1Kσk2≤ Lambda for which any algorithm incurs a variance-dependent lower bound of Omega(√deluLambda). However, this lower bound has a √d gap with existing upper bounds. Moreover, it only considers a fixed total variance budget Lambda and does not apply to a general variance sequence σ12,ldots,σK2. In this paper, to overcome the limitations of Jia et al. (2024), we consider the general variance sequence under two settings. For a prefixed sequence, where the entire variance sequence is revealed to the learner at the beginning of the learning process, we establish a variance-dependent lower bound of Omega(d √sumk=1Kσk2 /log K) for linear contextual bandits. For an adaptive sequence, where an adversary can generate the variance σk2 in each round k based on historical observations, we show that when the adversary must generate σk2 before observing the decision set Dk, a similar lower bound of Omega(d√ sumk=1Kσk2 /log6(dK)) holds. In both settings, our results match the upper bounds of the SAVE algorithm (Zhao et al., 2023) up to logarithmic factors.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2025.
Builds on
9 of 20 references.
References · 9
- 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processescited by 200
- 2018Information Directed Sampling and Bandits with Heteroscedastic Noisecited by 76
- 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
- 2022Computationally Efficient Horizon-Free Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture MDPscited by 52
- 2021Improved Variance-Aware Confidence Sets for Linear Bandits and Linear Mixture MDPcited by 45
- 2021Improved Regret Analysis for Variance-Adaptive Linear Bandits and Horizon-Free Linear Mixture MDPscited by 44
- 2023Variance-Dependent Regret Bounds for Linear Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: Adaptivity and Computational Efficiencycited by 40
- 2022Variance-Aware Sparse Linear Banditscited by 11
- 2024How Does Variance Shape the Regret in Contextual Bandits?cited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026A Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithm for Heteroskedastic Generalized Linear Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 1
- 2026Stochastic Linear Bandits with Parameter Noisecited by 0
- 2026Bandits for Efficient Experimentation: Adapting to Control Group, Preferences, and Context Driftscited by 0
- 2026Breaking the Total Variance Barrier: Sharp Sample Complexity for Linear Heteroscedastic Bandits with Fixed Action Setcited by 0
- 2026Breaking the Total Variance Barrier: Sharp Sample Complexity for Linear Heteroscedastic Bandits with Fixed Action Set26 Jul 2026
- 2026Bandits for Efficient Experimentation: Adapting to Control Group, Preferences, and Context Drifts8 Jun 2026
- 2026A Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithm for Heteroskedastic Generalized Linear Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions11 Feb 2026
- 2026Stochastic Linear Bandits with Parameter Noise30 Jan 2026