Complex behavior from intrinsic motivation to occupy action-state path space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most theories of behavior posit that agents tend to maximize some form of reward or utility. However, animals very often move with curiosity and seem to be motivated in a reward-free manner. Here we abandon the idea of reward maximization, and propose that the goal of behavior is maximizing occupancy of future paths of actions and states. According to this maximum occupancy principle, rewards are the means to occupy path space, not the goal per se; goal-directedness simply emerges as rational ways of searching for resources so that movement, understood amply, never ends. We find that action-state path entropy is the only measure consistent with additivity and other intuitive properties of expected future action-state path occupancy. We provide analytical expressions that relate the optimal policy and state-value function, and prove convergence of our value iteration algorithm. Using discrete and continuous state tasks, including a high--dimensional controller, we show that complex behaviors such as `dancing', hide-and-seek and a basic form of altruistic behavior naturally result from the intrinsic motivation to occupy path space. All in all, we present a theory of behavior that generates both variability and goal-directedness in the absence of reward maximization.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 132 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.
Builds on
37 of 132 references.
References · 37
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 752
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
- 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
- 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 309
- 2018Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learningcited by 280
- 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 267
25 more
- 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 249
- 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 242
- 2019Efficient Exploration via State Marginal Matchingcited by 188
- 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 182
- 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 182
- 2020Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement Learningcited by 177
- 2021Maximum Entropy RL (Provably) Solves Some Robust RL Problemscited by 176
- 2021Behavior From the Void: Unsupervised Active Pre-Trainingcited by 174
- 2017Equivalence Between Policy Gradients and Soft Q-Learningcited by 173
- 2015Variational Information Maximisation for Intrinsically Motivated Reinforcement Learningcited by 144
- 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 127
- 2021State Entropy Maximization with Random Encoders for Efficient Explorationcited by 108
- 2017Surprise-Based Intrinsic Motivation for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2021A Survey of Exploration Methods in Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
- 2020Deep active inference agents using Monte-Carlo methodscited by 72
- 2017The free energy principle for action and perception: A mathematical reviewcited by 66
- 2020Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in Regretcited by 58
- 2019Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RLcited by 53
- 2020Reinforcement Learning through Active Inferencecited by 47
- 2020What can I do here? A Theory of Affordances in Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
- 2020Action and Perception as Divergence Minimizationcited by 32
- 2019An Intrinsically-Motivated Approach for Learning Highly Exploring and Fast Mixing Policiescited by 20
- 2019A Unified Bellman Optimality Principle Combining Reward Maximization and Empowermentcited by 15
- 2016Planning with Information-Processing Constraints and Model Uncertainty in Markov Decision Processescited by 7
- 2020Metastable attractors explain the variable timing of stable behavioral action sequencescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2023A general Markov decision process formalism for action-state entropy-regularized reward maximizationcited by 1
- 2025The Conditions of Physical Embodiment Enable Generalization and Carecited by 1
- 2026A Quantifiable Information-Processing Hierarchy Provides a Necessary Condition for Detecting Agencycited by 1
- 2025Intuition emerges in Maximum Caliber models at criticalitycited by 0
- 2026Robust Successor Featurescited by 0
- 2026Belief-Based Maximum Occupancy Principle and Active Inferencecited by 0
- 2026When Do Intrinsic Rewards Lead to Exploration?cited by 0
- 2026When Do Intrinsic Rewards Lead to Exploration?1 Oct 2026
- 2026Belief-Based Maximum Occupancy Principle and Active Inference30 Sep 2026
- 2026Robust Successor Features25 Sep 2026
- 2026A Quantifiable Information-Processing Hierarchy Provides a Necessary Condition for Detecting Agency7 Jan 2026
- 2025The Conditions of Physical Embodiment Enable Generalization and Care8 Oct 2025
- 2025Intuition emerges in Maximum Caliber models at criticality8 Aug 2025
- 2023A general Markov decision process formalism for action-state entropy-regularized reward maximization2 Feb 2023