mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Conditions of Physical Embodiment Enable Generalization and Care

arXiv 2510.07117 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As artificial agents enter open-ended physical environments -- eldercare, disaster response, and space missions -- they must persist under uncertainty while providing reliable care. Yet current systems struggle to generalize across distribution shifts and lack intrinsic motivation to preserve the well-being of others. Vulnerability and mortality are often seen as constraints to be avoided, yet organisms survive and provide care in an open-ended world with relative ease and efficiency. We argue that generalization and care arise from conditions of physical embodiment: being-in-the-world (the agent is a part of the environment) and being-towards-death (unless counteracted, the agent drifts toward terminal states). These conditions necessitate a homeostatic drive to maintain oneself and maximize the future capacity to continue doing so. Fulfilling this drive over long time horizons in multi-agent environments necessitates robust causal modeling of self and others' embodiment and jointly achievable future states. Because embodied agents are part of the environment, with the self delimited by reliable control, empowering others can expand self-boundaries, enabling other-regard. This provides a path from embodiment toward generalization and care based in shared constraints. We outline a reinforcement-learning framework for examining these questions. Homeostatic mortal agents continually learning in open-ended environments may offer efficient robustness and trustworthy alignment.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

Builds on

7 of 30 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018World Modelscited by 1,513
  2. 2023Thermodynamic Computing System for AI Applicationscited by 16
  3. 2025Evolution and The Knightian Blindspot of Machine Learningcited by 11
  4. 2022Complex behavior from intrinsic motivation to occupy action-state path spacecited by 7
  5. 2022Need is All You Need: Homeostatic Neural Networks Adapt to Concept Shiftcited by 6
  6. 2024Empathic Coupling of Homeostatic States for Intrinsic Prosocialitycited by 1
  7. 2025"Cause" is Mechanistic Narrative within Scientific Domains: An Ordinary Language Philosophical Critique of "Causal Machine Learning"cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026OpenLife: Toward Open-World Artificial Life with Autonomous LLM Agents
  2. 2026Agentopia: Long-Term Life Simulation and Learning in Agent Societies
  3. 2026Acts of Configuration: Rethinking Provenance, Temporality and Legitimacy in Post-Mortem Agents ↗
  4. 2026ComBodied Agents: a New Paradigm of Human-Centric Agentic AI
  5. 2026From Generative Engines to Actionable Simulators: The Imperative of Physical Grounding in World Models
  6. 2024Emergence of Implicit World Models from Mortal Agents
  7. 2026The Tao of Agency: Autotelic AI, Embedded Agency and Dissolution of the Self
  8. 2026The Possibility of Artificial Intelligence Becoming a Subject and the Alignment Problem