mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MSTRIQ: No Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Swin Transformer with Multi-Stage Fusion

arXiv 2205.10101 ↗First posted 20 May 2022cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Measuring the perceptual quality of images automatically is an essential task in the area of computer vision, as degradations on image quality can exist in many processes from image acquisition, transmission to enhancing. Many Image Quality Assessment(IQA) algorithms have been designed to tackle this problem. However, it still remains un settled due to the various types of image distortions and the lack of large-scale human-rated datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm based on the Swin Transformer [31] with fused features from multiple stages, which aggregates information from both local and global features to better predict the quality. To address the issues of small-scale datasets, relative rankings of images have been taken into account together with regression loss to simultaneously optimize the model. Furthermore, effective data augmentation strategies are also used to improve the performance. In comparisons with previous works, experiments are carried out on two standard IQA datasets and a challenge dataset. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our work. The proposed method outperforms other methods on standard datasets and ranks 2nd in the no-reference track of NTIRE 2022 Perceptual Image Quality Assessment Challenge [53]. It verifies that our method is promising in solving diverse IQA problems and thus can be used to real-word applications.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.

Builds on

32 of 64 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  6. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  7. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  8. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  9. 2021SwinIR: Image Restoration Using Swin Transformercited by 1,869
  10. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  11. 2020Pre-Trained Image Processing Transformercited by 891
  12. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
20 more
  1. 2021DeepViT: Towards Deeper Vision Transformercited by 288
  2. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
  3. 2020PIPAL: a Large-Scale Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Perceptual Image Restorationcited by 177
  4. 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 150
  5. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  6. 2016Learning a No-Reference Quality Metric for Single-Image Super-Resolutioncited by 143
  7. 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 140
  8. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
  9. 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
  10. 2021Perceptual Image Quality Assessment with Transformerscited by 54
  11. 2021NTIRE 2021 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 18
  12. 2019An Alternative Cross Entropy Loss for Learning-to-Rankcited by 17
  13. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Hallucinating Pristine Featurescited by 16
  14. 2021Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: Structural Fidelity Versus Statistical Naturalnesscited by 15
  15. 2018KonIQ-10k: Towards an ecologically valid and large-scale IQA databasecited by 14
  16. 2019Learning to Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 14
  17. 2020Learning to Rank for Active Learning: A Listwise Approachcited by 11
  18. 2021Deep Perceptual Image Quality Assessment for Compressioncited by 9
  19. 2021Deep Neural Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment: Addressing the Data Challengecited by 3
  20. 2021VTAMIQ: Transformers for Attention Modulated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 2.

10 papers.