Deep Perceptual Image Quality Assessment for Compression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lossy Image compression is necessary for efficient storage and transfer of data. Typically the trade-off between bit-rate and quality determines the optimal compression level. This makes the image quality metric an integral part of any imaging system. While the existing full-reference metrics such as PSNR and SSIM may be less sensitive to perceptual quality, the recently introduced learning methods may fail to generalize to unseen data. In this paper we propose the largest image compression quality dataset to date with human perceptual preferences, enabling the use of deep learning, and we develop a full reference perceptual quality assessment metric for lossy image compression that outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods. We show that the proposed model can effectively learn from thousands of examples available in the new dataset, and consequently it generalizes better to other unseen datasets of human perceptual preference.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2021.
Builds on
11 of 25 references.
References · 11
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
- 2020Understanding SSIMcited by 75
- 2020The Rate-Distortion-Accuracy Tradeoff: JPEG Case Studycited by 22
- 2020Lossy Compression with Distortion Constrained Optimizationcited by 6
- 2020Rank-smoothed Pairwise Learning In Perceptual Quality Assessmentcited by 5
- 2020Perceptually Optimizing Deep Image Compressioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Exponentiated Gradient Reweighting for Robust Training Under Label Noise and Beyondcited by 16
- 2022DriftRec: Adapting diffusion models to blind JPEG restorationcited by 15
- 2022MSTRIQ: No Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Swin Transformer with Multi-Stage Fusioncited by 10
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Transformer Predicted Error Map and Perceptual Quality Tokencited by 5
- 2022Stay Positive: Non-Negative Image Synthesis for Augmented Realitycited by 4
- 2025Foreground Focus: Enhancing Coherence and Fidelity in Camouflaged Image Generationcited by 4
- 2024UlRe-NeRF: 3D Ultrasound Imaging through Neural Rendering with Ultrasound Reflection Direction Parameterizationcited by 3
- 2022Pixel-by-pixel Mean Opinion Score (pMOS) for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2024Super Efficient Neural Network for Compression Artifacts Reduction and Super Resolutioncited by 0
- 2025Foreground Focus: Enhancing Coherence and Fidelity in Camouflaged Image Generation2 Apr 2025
- 2024UlRe-NeRF: 3D Ultrasound Imaging through Neural Rendering with Ultrasound Reflection Direction Parameterization1 Aug 2024
- 2024Super Efficient Neural Network for Compression Artifacts Reduction and Super Resolution26 Jan 2024
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Transformer Predicted Error Map and Perceptual Quality Token16 May 2023
- 2022DriftRec: Adapting diffusion models to blind JPEG restoration12 Nov 2022
- 2022Pixel-by-pixel Mean Opinion Score (pMOS) for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment14 Jun 2022
- 2022MSTRIQ: No Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Swin Transformer with Multi-Stage Fusion20 May 2022
- 2022Stay Positive: Non-Negative Image Synthesis for Augmented Reality1 Feb 2022
- 2021Exponentiated Gradient Reweighting for Robust Training Under Label Noise and Beyond3 Apr 2021