mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EALM: Introducing Multidimensional Ethical Alignment in Conversational Information Retrieval

arXiv 2310.00970 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies should adhere to human norms to better serve our society and avoid disseminating harmful or misleading information, particularly in Conversational Information Retrieval (CIR). Previous work, including approaches and datasets, has not always been successful or sufficiently robust in taking human norms into consideration. To this end, we introduce a workflow that integrates ethical alignment, with an initial ethical judgment stage for efficient data screening. To address the need for ethical judgment in CIR, we present the QA-ETHICS dataset, adapted from the ETHICS benchmark, which serves as an evaluation tool by unifying scenarios and label meanings. However, each scenario only considers one ethical concept. Therefore, we introduce the MP-ETHICS dataset to evaluate a scenario under multiple ethical concepts, such as justice and Deontology. In addition, we suggest a new approach that achieves top performance in both binary and multi-label ethical judgment tasks. Our research provides a practical method for introducing ethical alignment into the CIR workflow. The data and code are available at https://github.com/wanng-ide/ealm .

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  6. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  7. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
  8. 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 361
  9. 2022LinkBERT: Pretraining Language Models with Document Linkscited by 211
  10. 2022SGPT: GPT Sentence Embeddings for Semantic Searchcited by 204
  11. 2021Can Machines Learn Morality? The Delphi Experimentcited by 141
  12. 2022Solving Math Word Problems via Cooperative Reasoning induced Language Modelscited by 77
8 more
  1. 2023Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 48
  2. 2020Do Neural Ranking Models Intensify Gender Bias?cited by 29
  3. 2022Zero-Shot Learners for Natural Language Understanding via a Unified Multiple Choice Perspectivecited by 14
  4. 2020DUMA: Reading Comprehension with Transposition Thinkingcited by 8
  5. 2022Debiasing Neural Retrieval via In-batch Balancing Regularizationcited by 5
  6. 2023Can ChatGPT and Bard Generate Aligned Assessment Items? A Reliability Analysis against Human Performancecited by 4
  7. 2021FAIR: Fairness-Aware Information Retrieval Evaluationcited by 3
  8. 2022Debiasing Gender Bias in Information Retrieval Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.