Exploring the Advantages of Dense-Vector to One-Hot Encoding of Intent Classes in Out-of-Scope Detection Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work explores the intrinsic limitations of the popular one-hot encoding method in classification of intents when detection of out-of-scope (OOS) inputs is required. Although recent work has shown that there can be significant improvements in OOS detection when the intent classes are represented as dense-vectors based on domain specific knowledge, we argue in this paper that such gains are more likely due to advantages of dense-vector to one-hot encoding methods in representing the complexity of the OOS space. We start by showing how dense-vector encodings can create OOS spaces with much richer topologies than one-hot encoding methods. We then demonstrate empirically, using four standard intent classification datasets, that knowledge-free, randomly generated dense-vector encodings of intent classes can yield massive, over 20% gains over one-hot encodings, and also outperform the previous, domain knowledge-based, SOTA of one of the datasets. We finish by describing a novel algorithm to search for good dense-vector encodings and present initial but promising experimental results of its use.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2022.
Builds on
23 of 44 references.
References · 23
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,360
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,371
- 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,544
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,475
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,327
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 799
- 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
- 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 381
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2013Zero-Shot Learning Through Cross-Modal Transfercited by 237
- 2014Evaluation of Output Embeddings for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 166
- 2015Label-Embedding for Image Classificationcited by 164
11 more
- 2019Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection by Maximum Classifier Discrepancycited by 112
- 2020Robust Out-of-distribution Detection for Neural Networkscited by 57
- 2019Out-of-distribution Detection in Classifiers via Generationcited by 49
- 2018Beyond One-hot Encoding: lower dimensional target embeddingcited by 42
- 2021Modeling Discriminative Representations for Out-of-Domain Detection with Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 42
- 2019Out-of-Domain Detection for Low-Resource Text Classification Taskscited by 36
- 2018Out-of-Distribution Detection using Multiple Semantic Label Representationscited by 22
- 2020HINT3: Raising the bar for Intent Detection in the Wildcited by 21
- 2018Neural Sentence Embedding using Only In-domain Sentences for Out-of-domain Sentence Detection in Dialog Systemscited by 18
- 2019Hyperparameter-Free Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Softmax of Scaled Cosine Similaritycited by 12
- 2021kFolden: k-Fold Ensemble for Out-Of-Distribution Detectioncited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.