mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation

arXiv 2205.01730 ↗First posted 3 May 2022cs.CL cs.HCcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Question generation (QGen) models are often evaluated with standardized NLG metrics that are based on n-gram overlap. In this paper, we measure whether these metric improvements translate to gains in a practical setting, focusing on the use case of helping teachers automate the generation of reading comprehension quizzes. In our study, teachers building a quiz receive question suggestions, which they can either accept or refuse with a reason. Even though we find that recent progress in QGen leads to a significant increase in question acceptance rates, there is still large room for improvement, with the best model having only 68.4% of its questions accepted by the ten teachers who participated in our study. We then leverage the annotations we collected to analyze standard NLG metrics and find that model performance has reached projected upper-bounds, suggesting new automatic metrics are needed to guide QGen research forward.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2022.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 330
  7. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
  8. 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 221
  9. 2017Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluationcited by 206
  10. 2017Learning to Ask: Neural Question Generation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 186
  11. 2018Learning to Ask Good Questions: Ranking Clarification Questions using Neural Expected Value of Perfect Informationcited by 110
  12. 2018The price of debiasing automatic metrics in natural language evaluationcited by 60
5 more
  1. 2018Towards a Better Metric for Evaluating Question Generation Systemscited by 52
  2. 2021MixQG: Neural Question Generation with Mixed Answer Typescited by 28
  3. 2019Evaluating Rewards for Question Generation Modelscited by 15
  4. 2021What's The Latest? A Question-driven News Chatbotcited by 14
  5. 2021I Do Not Understand What I Cannot Define: Automatic Question Generation With Pedagogically-Driven Content Selectioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

12 papers.