I Do Not Understand What I Cannot Define: Automatic Question Generation With Pedagogically-Driven Content Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most learners fail to develop deep text comprehension when reading textbooks passively. Posing questions about what learners have read is a well-established way of fostering their text comprehension. However, many textbooks lack self-assessment questions because authoring them is timeconsuming and expensive. Automatic question generators may alleviate this scarcity by generating sound pedagogical questions. However, generating questions automatically poses linguistic and pedagogical challenges. What should we ask? And, how do we phrase the question automatically? We address those challenges with an automatic question generator grounded in learning theory. The paper introduces a novel pedagogically meaningful content selection mechanism to find question-worthy sentences and answers in arbitrary textbook contents. We conducted an empirical evaluation study with educational experts, annotating 150 generated questions in six different domains. Results indicate a high linguistic quality of the generated questions. Furthermore, the evaluation results imply that the majority of the generated questions inquire central information related to the given text and may foster text comprehension in specific learning scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2021.
Builds on
10 of 51 references.
References · 10
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
- 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
- 2017Learning to Ask: Neural Question Generation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 186
- 2019Recent Advances in Neural Question Generationcited by 42
- 2018Improving Neural Question Generation using Answer Separationcited by 30
- 2020SemEval-2020 Task 6: Definition extraction from free text with the DEFT corpuscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children's curious question-asking skillscited by 29
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for Learning Complex Legal Concepts through Storytellingcited by 23
- 2022Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generationcited by 12
- 2023Evaluation of Question Generation Needs More Referencescited by 8
- 2025Savaal: Scalable Concept-Driven Question Generation to Enhance Human Learningcited by 7
- 2024Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trendscited by 3
- 2024Automating Turkish Educational Quiz Generation Using Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025Savaal: Scalable Concept-Driven Question Generation to Enhance Human Learning18 Feb 2025
- 2024Automating Turkish Educational Quiz Generation Using Large Language Models5 Jun 2024
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for Learning Complex Legal Concepts through Storytelling26 Feb 2024
- 2024Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trends15 Jan 2024
- 2023Evaluation of Question Generation Needs More References26 May 2023
- 2022GPT-3-driven pedagogical agents for training children's curious question-asking skills25 Nov 2022
- 2022Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation3 May 2022