mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

UniTE: Unified Translation Evaluation

arXiv 2204.13346 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 28

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Translation quality evaluation plays a crucial role in machine translation. According to the input format, it is mainly separated into three tasks, i.e., reference-only, source-only and source-reference-combined. Recent methods, despite their promising results, are specifically designed and optimized on one of them. This limits the convenience of these methods, and overlooks the commonalities among tasks. In this paper, we propose UniTE, which is the first unified framework engaged with abilities to handle all three evaluation tasks. Concretely, we propose monotonic regional attention to control the interaction among input segments, and unified pretraining to better adapt multi-task learning. We testify our framework on WMT 2019 Metrics and WMT 2020 Quality Estimation benchmarks. Extensive analyses show that our textitsingle model can universally surpass various state-of-the-art or winner methods across tasks. Both source code and associated models are available at https://github.com/NLP2CT/UniTE.

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2022.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  5. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  6. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  8. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
  9. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  10. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  11. 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 161
  12. 2021Towards Understanding Knowledge Distillationcited by 158
10 more
  1. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
  2. 2019Open Sesame: Getting Inside BERT's Linguistic Knowledgecited by 119
  3. 2020Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot Paraphrasingcited by 114
  4. 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 109
  5. 2020TransQuest: Translation Quality Estimation with Cross-lingual Transformerscited by 59
  6. 2020What Do Position Embeddings Learn? An Empirical Study of Pre-Trained Language Model Positional Encodingcited by 52
  7. 2019OpenKiwi: An Open Source Framework for Quality Estimationcited by 49
  8. 2020On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 36
  9. 2020Learning to Evaluate Translation Beyond English: BLEURT Submissions to the WMT Metrics 2020 Shared Taskcited by 25
  10. 2020Intelligent Translation Memory Matching and Retrieval with Sentence Encoderscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 7; 2023: 15; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

28 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
  2. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
  3. 2023Scaling up COMETKIWI: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 88
  4. 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 87
  5. 2023TIM: Teaching Large Language Models to Translate with Comparisoncited by 50
  6. 2023Interactive Natural Language Processingcited by 31
  7. 2023BLEURT Has Universal Translations: An Analysis of Automatic Metrics by Minimum Risk Trainingcited by 24
  8. 2023INSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedbackcited by 21
  9. 2022MENLI: Robust Evaluation Metrics from Natural Language Inferencecited by 18
  10. 2024Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translationcited by 16
  11. 2023The Inside Story: Towards Better Understanding of Machine Translation Neural Evaluation Metricscited by 15
  12. 2023Dancing Between Success and Failure: Edit-level Simplification Evaluation using SALSAcited by 15
16 more
  1. 2022Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metricscited by 14
  2. 2024MT-Ranker: Reference-free machine translation evaluation by inter-system rankingcited by 14
  3. 2023Poor Man's Quality Estimation: Predicting Reference-Based MT Metrics Without the Referencecited by 11
  4. 2024From Handcrafted Features to LLMs: A Brief Survey for Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 10
  5. 2023Training and Meta-Evaluating Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics at the Paragraph Levelcited by 9
  6. 2022Alibaba-Translate China's Submission for WMT 2022 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 7
  7. 2023Breeding Machine Translations: Evolutionary approach to survive and thrive in the world of automated evaluationcited by 5
  8. 2023Conformalizing Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 5
  9. 2024Sentence-level Aggregation of Lexical Metrics Correlates Stronger with Human Judgements than Corpus-level Aggregationcited by 5
  10. 2023Towards Fine-Grained Information: Identifying the Type and Location of Translation Errorscited by 4
  11. 2022Alibaba-Translate China's Submission for WMT 2022 Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 3
  12. 2023UMSE: Unified Multi-scenario Summarization Evaluationcited by 3
  13. 2022DATScore: Evaluating Translation with Data Augmented Translationscited by 2
  14. 2022Competency-Aware Neural Machine Translation: Can Machine Translation Know its Own Translation Quality?cited by 2
  15. 2024The Impact of Syntactic and Semantic Proximity on Machine Translation with Back-Translationcited by 2
  16. 2026Span-Level Machine Translation Meta-Evaluationcited by 0