mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to Evaluate Translation Beyond English: BLEURT Submissions to the WMT Metrics 2020 Shared Task

arXiv 2010.04297 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2020cs.CLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The quality of machine translation systems has dramatically improved over the last decade, and as a result, evaluation has become an increasingly challenging problem. This paper describes our contribution to the WMT 2020 Metrics Shared Task, the main benchmark for automatic evaluation of translation. We make several submissions based on BLEURT, a previously published metric based on transfer learning. We extend the metric beyond English and evaluate it on 14 language pairs for which fine-tuning data is available, as well as 4 "zero-shot" language pairs, for which we have no labelled examples. Additionally, we focus on English to German and demonstrate how to combine BLEURT's predictions with those of YiSi and use alternative reference translations to enhance the performance. Empirical results show that the models achieve competitive results on the WMT Metrics 2019 Shared Task, indicating their promise for the 2020 edition.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 7; 2023: 8; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

25 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translationcited by 111
  2. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  3. 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
  4. 2022Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering Evaluationcited by 67
  5. 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 58
  6. 2022Follow the Wisdom of the Crowd: Effective Text Generation via Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 54
  7. 2022Reward Gaming in Conditional Text Generationcited by 30
  8. 2022UniTE: Unified Translation Evaluationcited by 28
  9. 2022ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets for Evaluating Machine Translation Metricscited by 25
  10. 2023INSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedbackcited by 22
  11. 2021SynthBio: A Case Study in Human-AI Collaborative Curation of Text Datasetscited by 18
  12. 2024Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy Challenge Setscited by 18
13 more
  1. 2024Mitigating Metric Bias in Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 16
  2. 2023TransFool: An Adversarial Attack against Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 12
  3. 2025Has Machine Translation Evaluation Achieved Human Parity? The Human Reference and the Limits of Progresscited by 10
  4. 2022Disentangling Uncertainty in Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 9
  5. 2022TRUE: Re-evaluating Factual Consistency Evaluationcited by 8
  6. 2021Sentiment-Aware Measure (SAM) for Evaluating Sentiment Transfer by Machine Translation Systemscited by 4
  7. 2023A Classification-Guided Approach for Adversarial Attacks against Neural Machine Translationcited by 4
  8. 2023DIFFQG: Generating Questions to Summarize Factual Changescited by 3
  9. 2023ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets at WMT 2023cited by 3
  10. 2023Learning Translation Quality Evaluation on Low Resource Languages from Large Language Modelscited by 2
  11. 2023Joint Representations of Text and Knowledge Graphs for Retrieval and Evaluationcited by 1
  12. 2026PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine Translationcited by 1
  13. 2025Assessing and Improving Punctuation Robustness in English-Marathi Machine Translationcited by 0