Towards Fine-Grained Information: Identifying the Type and Location of Translation Errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-grained information on translation errors is helpful for the translation evaluation community. Existing approaches can not synchronously consider error position and type, failing to integrate the error information of both. In this paper, we propose Fine-Grained Translation Error Detection (FG-TED) task, aiming at identifying both the position and the type of translation errors on given source-hypothesis sentence pairs. Besides, we build an FG-TED model to predict the addition and omission errors -- two typical translation accuracy errors. First, we use a word-level classification paradigm to form our model and use the shortcut learning reduction to relieve the influence of monolingual features. Besides, we construct synthetic datasets for model training, and relieve the disagreement of data labeling in authoritative datasets, making the experimental benchmark concordant. Experiments show that our model can identify both error type and position concurrently, and gives state-of-the-art results on the restored dataset. Our model also delivers more reliable predictions on low-resource and transfer scenarios than existing baselines. The related datasets and the source code will be released in the future.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2023.
Builds on
25 of 43 references.
References · 25
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,035
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
- 2019KG-BERT: BERT for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 324
- 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
13 more
- 2020InfoXLM: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Cross-Lingual Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 237
- 2020Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generationcited by 152
- 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 128
- 2020Retrospective Reader for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 86
- 2019OpenKiwi: An Open Source Framework for Quality Estimationcited by 49
- 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
- 2019On Adversarial Removal of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
- 2022UniTE: Unified Translation Evaluationcited by 28
- 2022ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets for Evaluating Machine Translation Metricscited by 25
- 2021An Exploratory Analysis of Multilingual Word-Level Quality Estimation with Cross-Lingual Transformerscited by 18
- 2022Not All Errors are Equal: Learning Text Generation Metrics using Stratified Error Synthesiscited by 18
- 2016Learning recurrent representations for hierarchical behavior modelingcited by 16
- 2022As Little as Possible, as Much as Necessary: Detecting Over- and Undertranslations with Contrastive Conditioningcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
- 2023Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 15
- 2023BLEU Meets COMET: Combining Lexical and Neural Metrics Towards Robust Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 5
- 2024Prediction of Translation Techniques for the Translation Processcited by 0
- 2024Prediction of Translation Techniques for the Translation Process21 Mar 2024
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detection16 Oct 2023
- 2023Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation22 Jun 2023
- 2023BLEU Meets COMET: Combining Lexical and Neural Metrics Towards Robust Machine Translation Evaluation30 May 2023