mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MONCE Tracking Metrics: a comprehensive quantitative performance evaluation methodology for object tracking

arXiv 2204.05280 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating tracking model performance is a complicated task, particularly for non-contiguous, multi-object trackers that are crucial in defense applications. While there are various excellent tracking benchmarks available, this work expands them to quantify the performance of long-term, non-contiguous, multi-object and detection model assisted trackers. We propose a suite of MONCE (Multi-Object Non-Contiguous Entities) image tracking metrics that provide both objective tracking model performance benchmarks as well as diagnostic insight for driving tracking model development in the form of Expected Average Overlap, Short/Long Term Re-Identification, Tracking Recall, Tracking Precision, Longevity, Localization and Absence Prediction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2022.

Builds on

6 of 10 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020HOTA: A Higher Order Metric for Evaluating Multi-Object Trackingcited by 546
  2. 2014Multiple Object Tracking: A Literature Reviewcited by 165
  3. 2015A Novel Performance Evaluation Methodology for Single-Target Trackerscited by 113
  4. 2018Long-term Tracking in the Wild: A Benchmarkcited by 55
  5. 2016Discriminative Correlation Filter with Channel and Spatial Reliabilitycited by 45
  6. 2018Now you see me: evaluating performance in long-term visual trackingcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.