Now you see me: evaluating performance in long-term visual tracking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a new long-term tracking performance evaluation methodology and present a new challenging dataset of carefully selected sequences with many target disappearances. We perform an extensive evaluation of six long-term and nine short-term state-of-the-art trackers, using new performance measures, suitable for evaluating long-term tracking - tracking precision, recall and F-score. The evaluation shows that a good model update strategy and the capability of image-wide re-detection are critical for long-term tracking performance. We integrated the methodology in the VOT toolkit to automate experimental analysis and benchmarking and to facilitate the development of long-term trackers.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022RGBD1K: A Large-scale Dataset and Benchmark for RGB-D Object Trackingcited by 42
- 2023EgoTracks: A Long-term Egocentric Visual Object Tracking Datasetcited by 27
- 2021Is First Person Vision Challenging for Object Tracking?cited by 21
- 2022Beyond SOT: Tracking Multiple Generic Objects at Oncecited by 11
- 2022MONCE Tracking Metrics: a comprehensive quantitative performance evaluation methodology for object trackingcited by 0
- 2023EgoTracks: A Long-term Egocentric Visual Object Tracking Dataset9 Jan 2023
- 2022Beyond SOT: Tracking Multiple Generic Objects at Once22 Dec 2022
- 2022RGBD1K: A Large-scale Dataset and Benchmark for RGB-D Object Tracking21 Aug 2022
- 2022MONCE Tracking Metrics: a comprehensive quantitative performance evaluation methodology for object tracking11 Apr 2022
- 2021Is First Person Vision Challenging for Object Tracking?31 Aug 2021