mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Uniform Complexity for Text Generation

arXiv 2204.05185 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising results in a wide array of generative NLP tasks, such as summarization and machine translation. In the context of narrative generation, however, existing models still do not capture factors that contribute to producing consistent text. For instance, it is logical that a piece of text or a story should be uniformly readable throughout and that this form of complexity should be controllable. As such, if the complexity of an input text prompt is rated first-grade reading level in the Flesch Reading Ease test, then the generated text continuing the plot should also be within this range of complexity. With this in mind, we introduce Uniform Complexity for Text Generation (UCTG), a new benchmark test which raises the challenge of making generative models observe uniform linguistic properties with respect to prompts. We experiment with over 150+ linguistically and cognitively motivated features for evaluating text complexity in humans and generative models. From our results, we find that models such as GPT-2 struggle to preserve the complexity of input prompts used in its generations, even if finetuned with professionally written texts.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2022.

Builds on

24 of 86 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  2. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
  3. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 738
  4. 2020XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoningcited by 330
  5. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 232
  6. 2020Reformulating Unsupervised Style Transfer as Paraphrase Generationcited by 181
  7. 2021Do Long-Range Language Models Actually Use Long-Range Context?cited by 92
  8. 2019Do Massively Pretrained Language Models Make Better Storytellers?cited by 90
  9. 2020Continual Learning in Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 82
  10. 2020MEGATRON-CNTRL: Controllable Story Generation with External Knowledge Using Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 74
  11. 2020UNION: An Unreferenced Metric for Evaluating Open-ended Story Generationcited by 60
  12. 2020STORIUM: A Dataset and Evaluation Platform for Machine-in-the-Loop Story Generationcited by 56
12 more
  1. 2021A Plug-and-Play Method for Controlled Text Generationcited by 55
  2. 2021Perturbation CheckLists for Evaluating NLG Evaluation Metricscited by 49
  3. 2021Pushing on Text Readability Assessment: A Transformer Meets Handcrafted Linguistic Featurescited by 36
  4. 2019Paraphrasing with Large Language Modelscited by 35
  5. 2020Linguistic Features for Readability Assessmentcited by 35
  6. 2019Controlling Text Complexity in Neural Machine Translationcited by 32
  7. 2020Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Talecited by 28
  8. 2020Decoding Methods for Neural Narrative Generationcited by 18
  9. 2022A Baseline Readability Model for Cebuanocited by 10
  10. 2021Changing the Mind of Transformers for Topically-Controllable Language Generationcited by 7
  11. 2016Readability-based Sentence Ranking for Evaluating Text Simplificationcited by 5
  12. 2021Diverse Linguistic Features for Assessing Reading Difficulty of Educational Filipino Textscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

4 papers.