mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attack-Aware Noise Calibration for Differential Privacy

arXiv 2407.02191 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differential privacy (DP) is a widely used approach for mitigating privacy risks when training machine learning models on sensitive data. DP mechanisms add noise during training to limit the risk of information leakage. The scale of the added noise is critical, as it determines the trade-off between privacy and utility. The standard practice is to select the noise scale to satisfy a given privacy budget varepsilon. This privacy budget is in turn interpreted in terms of operational attack risks, such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of inference attacks aimed to recover information about the training data records. We show that first calibrating the noise scale to a privacy budget varepsilon, and then translating ε to attack risk leads to overly conservative risk assessments and unnecessarily low utility. Instead, we propose methods to directly calibrate the noise scale to a desired attack risk level, bypassing the step of choosing varepsilon. For a given notion of attack risk, our approach significantly decreases noise scale, leading to increased utility at the same level of privacy. We empirically demonstrate that calibrating noise to attack sensitivity/specificity, rather than varepsilon, when training privacy-preserving ML models substantially improves model accuracy for the same risk level. Our work provides a principled and practical way to improve the utility of privacy-preserving ML without compromising on privacy. The code is available at https://github.com/Felipe-Gomez/riskcal

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.

Builds on

40 of 66 references.

References · 40

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  6. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  7. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
  8. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  9. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  10. 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 233
  11. 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 218
  12. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
28 more
  1. 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
  2. 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 174
  3. 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
  4. 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 143
  5. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
  6. 2020Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptionscited by 108
  7. 2021Optimal Accounting of Differential Privacy via Characteristic Functioncited by 83
  8. 2022TAN Without a Burn: Scaling Laws of DP-SGDcited by 51
  9. 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 50
  10. 2014Deep Roto-Translation Scattering for Object Classificationcited by 49
  11. 2023Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in DP-SGDcited by 42
  12. 2014Differential Privacy: An Economic Method for Choosing Epsiloncited by 34
  13. 2023Gaussian Membership Inference Privacycited by 20
  14. 2022Optimal Membership Inference Bounds for Adaptive Composition of Sampled Gaussian Mechanismscited by 19
  15. 2021"I need a better description'': An Investigation Into User Expectations For Differential Privacycited by 17
  16. 2019That which we call privatecited by 14
  17. 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacycited by 14
  18. 2020Sharp Composition Bounds for Gaussian Differential Privacy via Edgeworth Expansioncited by 13
  19. 2023What Are the Chances? Explaining the Epsilon Parameter in Differential Privacycited by 13
  20. 2022What You See is What You Get: Principled Deep Learning via Distributional Generalizationcited by 10
  21. 2014Redrawing the Boundaries on Purchasing Data from Privacy-Sensitive Individualscited by 8
  22. 2022Visualizing Privacy-Utility Trade-Offs in Differentially Private Data Releasescited by 7
  23. 2021Generalization Techniques Empirically Outperform Differential Privacy against Membership Inferencecited by 5
  24. 2022The Saddle-Point Accountant for Differential Privacycited by 5
  25. 2022"Am I Private and If So, how Many?" - Communicating Privacy Guarantees of Differential Privacy with Risk Communication Formatscited by 4
  26. 2022Provable Membership Inference Privacycited by 4
  27. 2023Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with f-Differential Privacycited by 3
  28. 2024Closed-Form Bounds for DP-SGD against Record-level Inferencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.