mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Weakly Supervised Propagation Model for Rumor Verification and Stance Detection with Multiple Instance Learning

arXiv 2204.02626 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The diffusion of rumors on microblogs generally follows a propagation tree structure, that provides valuable clues on how an original message is transmitted and responded by users over time. Recent studies reveal that rumor detection and stance detection are two different but relevant tasks which can jointly enhance each other, e.g., rumors can be debunked by cross-checking the stances conveyed by their relevant microblog posts, and stances are also conditioned on the nature of the rumor. However, most stance detection methods require enormous post-level stance labels for training, which are labor-intensive given a large number of posts. Enlightened by Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) scheme, we first represent the diffusion of claims with bottom-up and top-down trees, then propose two tree-structured weakly supervised frameworks to jointly classify rumors and stances, where only the bag-level labels concerning claim's veracity are needed. Specifically, we convert the multi-class problem into a multiple MIL-based binary classification problem where each binary model focuses on differentiating a target stance or rumor type and other types. Finally, we propose a hierarchical attention mechanism to aggregate the binary predictions, including (1) a bottom-up or top-down tree attention layer to aggregate binary stances into binary veracity; and (2) a discriminative attention layer to aggregate the binary class into finer-grained classes. Extensive experiments conducted on three Twitter-based datasets demonstrate promising performance of our model on both claim-level rumor detection and post-level stance classification compared with state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2022.

Builds on

27 of 60 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  6. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
  7. 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
  8. 2015Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 305
  9. 2020Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-Directional Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 152
  10. 2020GCAN: Graph-aware Co-Attention Networks for Explainable Fake News Detection on Social Mediacited by 108
  11. 2017Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Surveycited by 103
  12. 2020Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representationscited by 97
15 more
  1. 2016Stance Detection with Bidirectional Conditional Encodingcited by 93
  2. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumourscited by 77
  3. 2018RumourEval 2019: Determining Rumour Veracity and Support for Rumourscited by 74
  4. 2015Analysing How People Orient to and Spread Rumours in Social Media by Looking at Conversational Threadscited by 62
  5. 2018All-in-one: Multi-task Learning for Rumour Verificationcited by 54
  6. 2020Interpretable Rumor Detection in Microblogs by Attending to User Interactionscited by 44
  7. 2021Rumor Detection on Twitter with Claim-Guided Hierarchical Graph Attention Networkscited by 29
  8. 2017Turing at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Sequential Approach to Rumour Stance Classification with Branch-LSTMcited by 20
  9. 2019Modeling Conversation Structure and Temporal Dynamics for Jointly Predicting Rumor Stance and Veracitycited by 15
  10. 2017Discourse-Aware Rumour Stance Classification in Social Media Using Sequential Classifierscited by 14
  11. 2016Stance Classification in Rumours as a Sequential Task Exploiting the Tree Structure of Social Media Conversationscited by 12
  12. 2020A Kernel of Truth: Determining Rumor Veracity on Twitter by Diffusion Pattern Alonecited by 12
  13. 2019Rumor Detection on Social Media: Datasets, Methods and Opportunitiescited by 8
  14. 2015Towards Detecting Rumours in Social Mediacited by 6
  15. 2016User Personalized Satisfaction Prediction via Multiple Instance Deep Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.