Stance Classification in Rumours as a Sequential Task Exploiting the Tree Structure of Social Media Conversations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rumour stance classification, the task that determines if each tweet in a collection discussing a rumour is supporting, denying, questioning or simply commenting on the rumour, has been attracting substantial interest. Here we introduce a novel approach that makes use of the sequence of transitions observed in tree-structured conversation threads in Twitter. The conversation threads are formed by harvesting users' replies to one another, which results in a nested tree-like structure. Previous work addressing the stance classification task has treated each tweet as a separate unit. Here we analyse tweets by virtue of their position in a sequence and test two sequential classifiers, Linear-Chain CRF and Tree CRF, each of which makes different assumptions about the conversational structure. We experiment with eight Twitter datasets, collected during breaking news, and show that exploiting the sequential structure of Twitter conversations achieves significant improvements over the non-sequential methods. Our work is the first to model Twitter conversations as a tree structure in this manner, introducing a novel way of tackling NLP tasks on Twitter conversations.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation Identificationcited by 75
- 2022Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformationcited by 45
- 2022A Weakly Supervised Propagation Model for Rumor Verification and Stance Detection with Multiple Instance Learningcited by 10
- 2021VRoC: Variational Autoencoder-aided Multi-task Rumor Classifier Based on Textcited by 9
- 2021STEM: Unsupervised STructural EMbedding for Stance Detectioncited by 9
- 2022Stanceosaurus: Classifying Stance Towards Multilingual Misinformationcited by 8
- 2024Reinforcement Tuning for Detecting Stances and Debunking Rumors Jointly with Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2021A Weakly Supervised Approach for Classifying Stance in Twitter Repliescited by 2
- 2023Migration Reframed? A multilingual analysis on the stance shift in Europe during the Ukrainian crisiscited by 2
- 2021Bi-Directional Recurrent Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Social Media Text Classificationcited by 1
- 2022Examining Political Rhetoric with Epistemic Stance Detectioncited by 1
- 2024SocialPET: Socially Informed Pattern Exploiting Training for Few-Shot Stance Detection in Social Mediacited by 1
- 2024Reinforcement Tuning for Detecting Stances and Debunking Rumors Jointly with Large Language Models4 Jun 2024
- 2024SocialPET: Socially Informed Pattern Exploiting Training for Few-Shot Stance Detection in Social Media8 Mar 2024
- 2023Migration Reframed? A multilingual analysis on the stance shift in Europe during the Ukrainian crisis6 Feb 2023
- 2022Examining Political Rhetoric with Epistemic Stance Detection29 Dec 2022
- 2022Stanceosaurus: Classifying Stance Towards Multilingual Misinformation28 Oct 2022
- 2022Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformation25 Oct 2022
- 2022A Weakly Supervised Propagation Model for Rumor Verification and Stance Detection with Multiple Instance Learning6 Apr 2022
- 2021Bi-Directional Recurrent Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Social Media Text Classification23 Dec 2021
- 2021STEM: Unsupervised STructural EMbedding for Stance Detection1 Dec 2021
- 2021A Weakly Supervised Approach for Classifying Stance in Twitter Replies12 Mar 2021
- 2021A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation Identification27 Feb 2021
- 2021VRoC: Variational Autoencoder-aided Multi-task Rumor Classifier Based on Text28 Jan 2021