mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stance Classification in Rumours as a Sequential Task Exploiting the Tree Structure of Social Media Conversations

arXiv 1609.09028 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2016cs.CL cs.SIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rumour stance classification, the task that determines if each tweet in a collection discussing a rumour is supporting, denying, questioning or simply commenting on the rumour, has been attracting substantial interest. Here we introduce a novel approach that makes use of the sequence of transitions observed in tree-structured conversation threads in Twitter. The conversation threads are formed by harvesting users' replies to one another, which results in a nested tree-like structure. Previous work addressing the stance classification task has treated each tweet as a separate unit. Here we analyse tweets by virtue of their position in a sequence and test two sequential classifiers, Linear-Chain CRF and Tree CRF, each of which makes different assumptions about the conversational structure. We experiment with eight Twitter datasets, collected during breaking news, and show that exploiting the sequential structure of Twitter conversations achieves significant improvements over the non-sequential methods. Our work is the first to model Twitter conversations as a tree structure in this manner, introducing a novel way of tackling NLP tasks on Twitter conversations.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

12 papers.