mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semi-Supervised Learning of Semantic Correspondence with Pseudo-Labels

arXiv 2203.16038 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Establishing dense correspondences across semantically similar images remains a challenging task due to the significant intra-class variations and background clutters. Traditionally, a supervised learning was used for training the models, which required tremendous manually-labeled data, while some methods suggested a self-supervised or weakly-supervised learning to mitigate the reliance on the labeled data, but with limited performance. In this paper, we present a simple, but effective solution for semantic correspondence that learns the networks in a semi-supervised manner by supplementing few ground-truth correspondences via utilization of a large amount of confident correspondences as pseudo-labels, called SemiMatch. Specifically, our framework generates the pseudo-labels using the model's prediction itself between source and weakly-augmented target, and uses pseudo-labels to learn the model again between source and strongly-augmented target, which improves the robustness of the model. We also present a novel confidence measure for pseudo-labels and data augmentation tailored for semantic correspondence. In experiments, SemiMatch achieves state-of-the-art performance on various benchmarks, especially on PF-Willow by a large margin.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2022.

Builds on

48 of 71 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  3. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  5. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
  6. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  7. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  8. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 974
  9. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
  10. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  11. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  12. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
36 more
  1. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  2. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 507
  3. 2017Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning resultscited by 470
  4. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  5. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  6. 2020Rethinking Pre-training and Self-trainingcited by 352
  7. 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
  8. 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
  9. 2017UnFlow: Unsupervised Learning of Optical Flow with a Bidirectional Census Losscited by 202
  10. 2021Hypercorrelation Squeeze for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 193
  11. 2021Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 147
  12. 2019SPair-71k: A Large-scale Benchmark for Semantic Correspondencecited by 140
  13. 2019GLU-Net: Global-Local Universal Network for Dense Flow and Correspondencescited by 139
  14. 2017Convolutional neural network architecture for geometric matchingcited by 138
  15. 2017Visual Attribute Transfer through Deep Image Analogycited by 123
  16. 2020Efficient Neighbourhood Consensus Networks via Submanifold Sparse Convolutionscited by 92
  17. 2016Universal Correspondence Networkcited by 82
  18. 2021SimPLE: Similar Pseudo Label Exploitation for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 68
  19. 2018DGC-Net: Dense Geometric Correspondence Networkcited by 67
  20. 2019DDFlow: Learning Optical Flow with Unlabeled Data Distillationcited by 63
  21. 2017End-to-end weakly-supervised semantic alignmentcited by 60
  22. 2019SFNet: Learning Object-aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 60
  23. 2015Proposal Flowcited by 57
  24. 2020FeatMatch: Feature-Based Augmentation for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 57
  25. 2019Hyperpixel Flow: Semantic Correspondence with Multi-layer Neural Featurescited by 56
  26. 2020Learning to Compose Hypercolumns for Visual Correspondencecited by 53
  27. 2020GOCor: Bringing Globally Optimized Correspondence Volumes into Your Neural Networkcited by 53
  28. 2017SCNet: Learning Semantic Correspondencecited by 48
  29. 2019Dynamic Context Correspondence Network for Semantic Alignmentcited by 43
  30. 2021Convolutional Hough Matching Networkscited by 43
  31. 2017FCSS: Fully Convolutional Self-Similarity for Dense Semantic Correspondencecited by 42
  32. 2020Correspondence Networks with Adaptive Neighbourhood Consensuscited by 42
  33. 2018Recurrent Transformer Networks for Semantic Correspondencecited by 32
  34. 2021Multi-scale Matching Networks for Semantic Correspondencecited by 32
  35. 2018Attentive Semantic Alignment with Offset-Aware Correlation Kernelscited by 31
  36. 2019Semantic Attribute Matching Networkscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: