mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Match me if you can: Semi-Supervised Semantic Correspondence Learning with Unpaired Images

arXiv 2311.18540 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic correspondence methods have advanced to obtaining high-quality correspondences employing complicated networks, aiming to maximize the model capacity. However, despite the performance improvements, they may remain constrained by the scarcity of training keypoint pairs, a consequence of the limited training images and the sparsity of keypoints. This paper builds on the hypothesis that there is an inherent data-hungry matter in learning semantic correspondences and uncovers the models can be more trained by employing densified training pairs. We demonstrate a simple machine annotator reliably enriches paired key points via machine supervision, requiring neither extra labeled key points nor trainable modules from unlabeled images. Consequently, our models surpass current state-of-the-art models on semantic correspondence learning benchmarks like SPair-71k, PF-PASCAL, and PF-WILLOW and enjoy further robustness on corruption benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/naver-ai/matchme.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2023.

Builds on

45 of 61 references.

References · 45

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  3. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  4. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  5. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  6. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 966
  7. 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 780
  8. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
  9. 2023Emergent Correspondence from Image Diffusioncited by 437
  10. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  11. 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
  12. 2023A Tale of Two Features: Stable Diffusion Complements DINO for Zero-Shot Semantic Correspondencecited by 297
33 more
  1. 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 246
  2. 2023Diffusion Hyperfeatures: Searching Through Time and Space for Semantic Correspondencecited by 211
  3. 2021Hypercorrelation Squeeze for Few-Shot Segmentationcited by 193
  4. 2021Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 147
  5. 2019SPair-71k: A Large-scale Benchmark for Semantic Correspondencecited by 140
  6. 2019GLU-Net: Global-Local Universal Network for Dense Flow and Correspondencescited by 139
  7. 2017Convolutional neural network architecture for geometric matchingcited by 138
  8. 2023Unsupervised Semantic Correspondence Using Stable Diffusioncited by 120
  9. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 117
  10. 2018DGC-Net: Dense Geometric Correspondence Networkcited by 67
  11. 2019SFNet: Learning Object-aware Semantic Correspondencecited by 60
  12. 2015Proposal Flowcited by 57
  13. 2019Hyperpixel Flow: Semantic Correspondence with Multi-layer Neural Featurescited by 56
  14. 2020Reference-Based Sketch Image Colorization using Augmented-Self Reference and Dense Semantic Correspondencecited by 53
  15. 2020Learning to Compose Hypercolumns for Visual Correspondencecited by 53
  16. 2022CATs++: Boosting Cost Aggregation with Convolutions and Transformerscited by 53
  17. 2020Online Adaptation for Consistent Mesh Reconstruction in the Wildcited by 51
  18. 2017SCNet: Learning Semantic Correspondencecited by 48
  19. 2021Rethinking Pseudo Labels for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 45
  20. 2019Dynamic Context Correspondence Network for Semantic Alignmentcited by 43
  21. 2021Convolutional Hough Matching Networkscited by 43
  22. 2020Correspondence Networks with Adaptive Neighbourhood Consensuscited by 42
  23. 2021Warp Consistency for Unsupervised Learning of Dense Correspondencescited by 42
  24. 2021Multi-scale Matching Networks for Semantic Correspondencecited by 32
  25. 2022Learning Semantic Correspondence with Sparse Annotationscited by 31
  26. 2022Probabilistic Warp Consistency for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Correspondencescited by 30
  27. 2022TransforMatcher: Match-to-Match Attention for Semantic Correspondencecited by 29
  28. 2019Semantic Attribute Matching Networkscited by 20
  29. 2021Learning monocular 3D reconstruction of articulated categories from motioncited by 18
  30. 2022Semi-Supervised Learning of Semantic Correspondence with Pseudo-Labelscited by 16
  31. 2015Dense Semantic Correspondence where Every Pixel is a Classifiercited by 15
  32. 2023Efficient Semantic Matching with Hypercolumn Correlationcited by 6
  33. 2019Semi-Supervised Semantic Matchingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.