A Note on Target Q-learning For Solving Finite MDPs with A Generative Oracle
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Q-learning with function approximation could diverge in the off-policy setting and the target network is a powerful technique to address this issue. In this manuscript, we examine the sample complexity of the associated target Q-learning algorithm in the tabular case with a generative oracle. We point out a misleading claim in [Lee and He, 2020] and establish a tight analysis. In particular, we demonstrate that the sample complexity of the target Q-learning algorithm in [Lee and He, 2020] is widetildemathcal O(|mathcal S|2|mathcal A|2 (1-γ)-5varepsilon-2). Furthermore, we show that this sample complexity is improved to widetildemathcal O(|mathcal S||mathcal A| (1-γ)-5varepsilon-2) if we can sequentially update all state-action pairs and widetildemathcal O(|mathcal S||mathcal A| (1-γ)-4varepsilon-2) if γ is further in (1/2, 1). Compared with the vanilla Q-learning, our results conclude that the introduction of a periodically-frozen target Q-function does not sacrifice the sample complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2022.
Builds on
15 of 28 references.
References · 15
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
- 2020Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast Improvementscited by 112
- 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
- 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
- 2017Variance Reduced Value Iteration and Faster Algorithms for Solving Markov Decision Processescited by 56
- 2020Least Squares Regression with Markovian Data: Fundamental Limits and Algorithmscited by 56
- 2021Breaking the Deadly Triad with a Target Networkcited by 47
- 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
3 more
- 2019Target-Based Temporal Difference Learningcited by 20
- 2021Online Target Q-learning with Reverse Experience Replay: Efficiently finding the Optimal Policy for Linear MDPscited by 19
- 2020Periodic Q-Learningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Provably and Practically Efficient Adversarial Imitation Learning with General Function Approximationcited by 6
- 2022Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learningcited by 5
- 2022Event Tables for Efficient Experience Replaycited by 4
- 2026Adversarial Imitation Learning with General Function Approximation: Theoretical Analysis and Practical Algorithmscited by 1
- 2026Adversarial Imitation Learning with General Function Approximation: Theoretical Analysis and Practical Algorithms3 May 2026
- 2024Provably and Practically Efficient Adversarial Imitation Learning with General Function Approximation1 Nov 2024
- 2022Event Tables for Efficient Experience Replay1 Nov 2022
- 2022Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learning1 Jun 2022