mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Note on Target Q-learning For Solving Finite MDPs with A Generative Oracle

arXiv 2203.11489 ↗First posted 22 Mar 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Q-learning with function approximation could diverge in the off-policy setting and the target network is a powerful technique to address this issue. In this manuscript, we examine the sample complexity of the associated target Q-learning algorithm in the tabular case with a generative oracle. We point out a misleading claim in [Lee and He, 2020] and establish a tight analysis. In particular, we demonstrate that the sample complexity of the target Q-learning algorithm in [Lee and He, 2020] is widetildemathcal O(|mathcal S|2|mathcal A|2 (1-γ)-5varepsilon-2). Furthermore, we show that this sample complexity is improved to widetildemathcal O(|mathcal S||mathcal A| (1-γ)-5varepsilon-2) if we can sequentially update all state-action pairs and widetildemathcal O(|mathcal S||mathcal A| (1-γ)-4varepsilon-2) if γ is further in (1/2, 1). Compared with the vanilla Q-learning, our results conclude that the introduction of a periodically-frozen target Q-function does not sacrifice the sample complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2022.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  4. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
  5. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
  6. 2020Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast Improvementscited by 112
  7. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
  8. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
  9. 2017Variance Reduced Value Iteration and Faster Algorithms for Solving Markov Decision Processescited by 56
  10. 2020Least Squares Regression with Markovian Data: Fundamental Limits and Algorithmscited by 56
  11. 2021Breaking the Deadly Triad with a Target Networkcited by 47
  12. 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
3 more
  1. 2019Target-Based Temporal Difference Learningcited by 20
  2. 2021Online Target Q-learning with Reverse Experience Replay: Efficiently finding the Optimal Policy for Linear MDPscited by 19
  3. 2020Periodic Q-Learningcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.