Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks with Training-free Hybrid Image Transformation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, the adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks (DNNs) has raised increasing attention. Among all the threat models, no-box attacks are the most practical but extremely challenging since they neither rely on any knowledge of the target model or similar substitute model, nor access the dataset for training a new substitute model. Although a recent method has attempted such an attack in a loose sense, its performance is not good enough and computational overhead of training is expensive. In this paper, we move a step forward and show the existence of a training-free adversarial perturbation under the no-box threat model, which can be successfully used to attack different DNNs in real-time. Motivated by our observation that high-frequency component (HFC) domains in low-level features and plays a crucial role in classification, we attack an image mainly by manipulating its frequency components. Specifically, the perturbation is manipulated by suppression of the original HFC and adding of noisy HFC. We empirically and experimentally analyze the requirements of effective noisy HFC and show that it should be regionally homogeneous, repeating and dense. Extensive experiments on the ImageNet dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed no-box method. It attacks ten well-known models with a success rate of 98.13% on average, which outperforms state-of-the-art no-box attacks by 29.39%. Furthermore, our method is even competitive to mainstream transfer-based black-box attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.
Builds on
66 of 101 references.
References · 66
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
38 more
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 718
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
- 2017Progressive Neural Architecture Searchcited by 487
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 446
- 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 442
- 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 355
- 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
- 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 314
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 197
- 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
- 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 175
- 2020Skip Connections Matter: On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Generated with ResNetscited by 167
- 2019Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability with an Intermediate Level Attackcited by 140
- 2019Cross-Domain Transferability of Adversarial Perturbationscited by 92
- 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
- 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
- 2020Patch-wise Attack for Fooling Deep Neural Networkcited by 78
- 2018Shield: Fast, Practical Defense and Vaccination for Deep Learning using JPEG Compressioncited by 74
50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
9 papers.
- 2022Practical Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness via Adaptive Auto Attackcited by 44
- 2023Practical Deep Dispersed Watermarking with Synchronization and Fusioncited by 15
- 2023SoK: Pitfalls in Evaluating Black-Box Attackscited by 6
- 2024Adversarial Attacks on Hidden Tasks in Multi-Task Learningcited by 2
- 2025NoPain: No-box Point Cloud Attack via Optimal Transport Singular Boundarycited by 2
- 2026Rendering-Aware Bayesian 3D Gaussian Splatting with Native Uncertainty and Adaptive Complexity Controlcited by 2
- 2024On Synthetic Texture Datasets: Challenges, Creation, and Curationcited by 0
- 2026Toward Sub-1 kB Identity-Preserving Face Compression: A Benchmark of Codecs, a Custom Learned Codec, and Studies of Resolution, Demographic Fairness, Recompression, and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 0
- 2026No-Box Vulnerability Analysis: Description-only Detection of Indirect Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in MCP Serverscited by 0
- 2026No-Box Vulnerability Analysis: Description-only Detection of Indirect Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in MCP Servers9 Sep 2026
- 2026Toward Sub-1 kB Identity-Preserving Face Compression: A Benchmark of Codecs, a Custom Learned Codec, and Studies of Resolution, Demographic Fairness, Recompression, and Adversarial Robustness24 Aug 2026
- 2026Rendering-Aware Bayesian 3D Gaussian Splatting with Native Uncertainty and Adaptive Complexity Control6 Jul 2026
- 2025NoPain: No-box Point Cloud Attack via Optimal Transport Singular Boundary27 Feb 2025
- 2024On Synthetic Texture Datasets: Challenges, Creation, and Curation16 Sep 2024
- 2024Adversarial Attacks on Hidden Tasks in Multi-Task Learning24 May 2024
- 2023SoK: Pitfalls in Evaluating Black-Box Attacks26 Oct 2023
- 2023Practical Deep Dispersed Watermarking with Synchronization and Fusion23 Oct 2023
- 2022Practical Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness via Adaptive Auto Attack10 Mar 2022