mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks with Training-free Hybrid Image Transformation

arXiv 2203.04607 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, the adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks (DNNs) has raised increasing attention. Among all the threat models, no-box attacks are the most practical but extremely challenging since they neither rely on any knowledge of the target model or similar substitute model, nor access the dataset for training a new substitute model. Although a recent method has attempted such an attack in a loose sense, its performance is not good enough and computational overhead of training is expensive. In this paper, we move a step forward and show the existence of a training-free adversarial perturbation under the no-box threat model, which can be successfully used to attack different DNNs in real-time. Motivated by our observation that high-frequency component (HFC) domains in low-level features and plays a crucial role in classification, we attack an image mainly by manipulating its frequency components. Specifically, the perturbation is manipulated by suppression of the original HFC and adding of noisy HFC. We empirically and experimentally analyze the requirements of effective noisy HFC and show that it should be regionally homogeneous, repeating and dense. Extensive experiments on the ImageNet dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed no-box method. It attacks ten well-known models with a success rate of 98.13% on average, which outperforms state-of-the-art no-box attacks by 29.39%. Furthermore, our method is even competitive to mainstream transfer-based black-box attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.

Builds on

66 of 101 references.

References · 66

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  7. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  8. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  9. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  10. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  11. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  12. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
38 more
  1. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  2. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  3. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  6. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  7. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  8. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  10. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
  11. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  12. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  13. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  14. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
  15. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  16. 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 718
  17. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
  18. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
  19. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
  20. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
  21. 2017Progressive Neural Architecture Searchcited by 487
  22. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
  23. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 446
  24. 2019Evading Defenses to Transferable Adversarial Examples by Translation-Invariant Attackscited by 442
  25. 2019Nesterov Accelerated Gradient and Scale Invariance for Adversarial Attackscited by 355
  26. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
  27. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 314
  28. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  29. 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 197
  30. 2020A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 180
  31. 2019Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognitioncited by 175
  32. 2020Skip Connections Matter: On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Generated with ResNetscited by 167
  33. 2019Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability with an Intermediate Level Attackcited by 140
  34. 2019Cross-Domain Transferability of Adversarial Perturbationscited by 92
  35. 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
  36. 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
  37. 2020Patch-wise Attack for Fooling Deep Neural Networkcited by 78
  38. 2018Shield: Fast, Practical Defense and Vaccination for Deep Learning using JPEG Compressioncited by 74

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

9 papers.