mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data-Efficient and Interpretable Tabular Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2203.02034 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2022cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomaly detection (AD) plays an important role in numerous applications. We focus on two understudied aspects of AD that are critical for integration into real-world applications. First, most AD methods cannot incorporate labeled data that are often available in practice in small quantities and can be crucial to achieve high AD accuracy. Second, most AD methods are not interpretable, a bottleneck that prevents stakeholders from understanding the reason behind the anomalies. In this paper, we propose a novel AD framework that adapts a white-box model class, Generalized Additive Models, to detect anomalies using a partial identification objective which naturally handles noisy or heterogeneous features. In addition, the proposed framework, DIAD, can incorporate a small amount of labeled data to further boost anomaly detection performances in semi-supervised settings. We demonstrate the superiority of our framework compared to previous work in both unsupervised and semi-supervised settings using diverse tabular datasets. For example, under 5 labeled anomalies DIAD improves from 86.2% to 89.4% AUC by learning AD from unlabeled data. We also present insightful interpretations that explain why DIAD deems certain samples as anomalies.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2022.

Builds on

25 of 51 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  5. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  6. 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
  7. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
  8. 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
  9. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
  10. 2018Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoderscited by 263
  11. 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 210
  12. 2019Sparse Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 167
13 more
  1. 2019Deep Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networkscited by 152
  2. 2020COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier Detectioncited by 143
  3. 2020Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class Classificationcited by 133
  4. 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 126
  5. 2021Neural Transformation Learning for Deep Anomaly Detection Beyond Imagescited by 98
  6. 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
  7. 2017Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillationcited by 62
  8. 2020How Interpretable and Trustworthy are GAMs?cited by 44
  9. 2018Towards Explaining Anomalies: A Deep Taylor Decomposition of One-Class Modelscited by 24
  10. 2021GAM Changer: Editing Generalized Additive Models with Interactive Visualizationcited by 18
  11. 2019PIDForest: Anomaly Detection via Partial Identificationcited by 13
  12. 2021ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forestscited by 9
  13. 2017Incorporating Feedback into Tree-based Anomaly Detectioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: