Interpretable Prediction and Feature Selection for Survival Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Survival analysis is widely used as a technique to model time-to-event data when some data is censored, particularly in healthcare for predicting future patient risk. In such settings, survival models must be both accurate and interpretable so that users (such as doctors) can trust the model and understand model predictions. While most literature focuses on discrimination, interpretability is equally as important. A successful interpretable model should be able to describe how changing each feature impacts the outcome, and should only use a small number of features. In this paper, we present DyS (pronounced ``dice''), a new survival analysis model that achieves both strong discrimination and interpretability. DyS is a feature-sparse Generalized Additive Model, combining feature selection and interpretable prediction into one model. While DyS works well for all survival analysis problems, it is particularly useful for large (in n and p) survival datasets such as those commonly found in observational healthcare studies. Empirical studies show that DyS competes with other state-of-the-art machine learning models for survival analysis, while being highly interpretable.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2024.
Builds on
30 of 78 references.
References · 30
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2016DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Networkcited by 358
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2017Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series datacited by 290
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
- 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
- 2017Machine Learning for Survival Analysis: A Surveycited by 112
- 2020On the Tractability of SHAP Explanationscited by 92
- 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
- 2023Deep Learning for Survival Analysis: A Reviewcited by 75
18 more
- 2018A Scalable Discrete-Time Survival Model for Neural Networkscited by 72
- 2018Deep Recurrent Survival Analysiscited by 61
- 2020The Tree Ensemble Layer: Differentiability meets Conditional Computationcited by 57
- 2021Deep Cox Mixtures for Survival Regressioncited by 44
- 2019Purifying Interaction Effects with the Functional ANOVA: An Efficient Algorithm for Recovering Identifiable Additive Modelscited by 42
- 2020SurvLIME: A method for explaining machine learning survival modelscited by 34
- 2018Countdown Regression: Sharp and Calibrated Survival Predictionscited by 31
- 2020Consistent Feature Selection for Analytic Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2022Sparse Neural Additive Model: Interpretable Deep Learning with Feature Selection via Group Sparsitycited by 25
- 2022SurvSHAP(t): Time-dependent explanations of machine learning survival modelscited by 24
- 2019A study of data and label shift in the LIME frameworkcited by 17
- 2022Data-Efficient and Interpretable Tabular Anomaly Detectioncited by 15
- 2021Survival stacking: casting survival analysis as a classification problemcited by 13
- 2020Estimation of conditional mixture Weibull distribution with right-censored data using neural network for time-to-event analysiscited by 11
- 2021ControlBurn: Feature Selection by Sparse Forestscited by 9
- 2022Extending the Neural Additive Model for Survival Analysis with EHR Datacited by 6
- 2023Interpretable Survival Analysis for Heart Failure Risk Predictioncited by 6
- 2019Gradient Boosting Survival Tree with Applications in Credit Scoringcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.