Overlooked Implications of the Reconstruction Loss for VAE Disentanglement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning disentangled representations with variational autoencoders (VAEs) is often attributed to the regularisation component of the loss. In this work, we highlight the interaction between data and the reconstruction term of the loss as the main contributor to disentanglement in VAEs. We show that standard benchmark datasets have unintended correlations between their subjective ground-truth factors and perceived axes in the data according to typical VAE reconstruction losses. Our work exploits this relationship to provide a theory for what constitutes an adversarial dataset under a given reconstruction loss. We verify this by constructing an example dataset that prevents disentanglement in state-of-the-art frameworks while maintaining human-intuitive ground-truth factors. Finally, we re-enable disentanglement by designing an example reconstruction loss that is once again able to perceive the ground-truth factors. Our findings demonstrate the subjective nature of disentanglement and the importance of considering the interaction between the ground-truth factors, data and notably, the reconstruction loss, which is under-recognised in the literature.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2022.
Builds on
12 of 34 references.
References · 12
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 332
- 2017Variational Inference of Disentangled Latent Concepts from Unlabeled Observationscited by 240
- 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
- 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
- 2017InfoVAE: Information Maximizing Variational Autoencoderscited by 124
- 2019On the Transfer of Inductive Bias from Simulation to the Real World: a New Disentanglement Datasetcited by 100
- 2018Variational Autoencoders Pursue PCA Directions (by Accident)cited by 84
- 2020Measuring Disentanglement: A Review of Metricscited by 69
- 2020On the Transfer of Disentangled Representations in Realistic Settingscited by 63
- 2021Demystifying Inductive Biases for β-VAE Based Architecturescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
7 papers.
- 2023Learning Disentangled Semantic Spaces of Explanations via Invertible Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2023Graph-Induced Syntactic-Semantic Spaces in Transformer-Based Variational AutoEncoderscited by 6
- 2023Disentanglement Learning via Topologycited by 4
- 2024Disentangling Disentangled Representations: Towards Improved Latent Units via Diffusion Modelscited by 4
- 2025Make Haste Slowly: A Theory of Emergent Structured Mixed Selectivity in Feature Learning ReLU Networkscited by 2
- 2025Unveiling and Steering Connectome Organization with Interpretable Latent Variablescited by 0
- 2025Exploring Image Generation via Mutually Exclusive Probability Spaces and Local Correlation Hypothesiscited by 0
- 2025Exploring Image Generation via Mutually Exclusive Probability Spaces and Local Correlation Hypothesis26 Jun 2025
- 2025Unveiling and Steering Connectome Organization with Interpretable Latent Variables19 May 2025
- 2025Make Haste Slowly: A Theory of Emergent Structured Mixed Selectivity in Feature Learning ReLU Networks8 Mar 2025
- 2024Disentangling Disentangled Representations: Towards Improved Latent Units via Diffusion Models31 Oct 2024
- 2023Graph-Induced Syntactic-Semantic Spaces in Transformer-Based Variational AutoEncoders14 Nov 2023
- 2023Disentanglement Learning via Topology24 Aug 2023
- 2023Learning Disentangled Semantic Spaces of Explanations via Invertible Neural Networks2 May 2023