Pairwise Neural Machine Translation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel framework for machine translation evaluation using neural networks in a pairwise setting, where the goal is to select the better translation from a pair of hypotheses, given the reference translation. In this framework, lexical, syntactic and semantic information from the reference and the two hypotheses is compacted into relatively small distributed vector representations, and fed into a multi-layer neural network that models the interaction between each of the hypotheses and the reference, as well as between the two hypotheses. These compact representations are in turn based on word and sentence embeddings, which are learned using neural networks. The framework is flexible, allows for efficient learning and classification, and yields correlation with humans that rivals the state of the art.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Translation Quality Assessment: A Brief Survey on Manual and Automatic Methodscited by 23
- 2022Towards Automated Document Revision: Grammatical Error Correction, Fluency Edits, and Beyondcited by 20
- 2024MT-Ranker: Reference-free machine translation evaluation by inter-system rankingcited by 14
- 2023Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information Retrievalcited by 11
- 2025Enhancing Human Evaluation in Machine Translation with Comparative Judgmentcited by 7
- 2022An Overview on Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 4
- 2024Learning to Compare Hardware Designs for High-Level Synthesiscited by 3
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Natural Language Generation Advances from the Perspective of Digital Deceptioncited by 1
- 2026PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine Translationcited by 1
- 2021SUper Team at SemEval-2016 Task 3: Building a feature-rich system for community question answeringcited by 0
- 2023Trained MT Metrics Learn to Cope with Machine-translated Referencescited by 0
- 2026PEAR: Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring in Machine Translation25 Jan 2026
- 2025Enhancing Human Evaluation in Machine Translation with Comparative Judgment25 Feb 2025
- 2024Learning to Compare Hardware Designs for High-Level Synthesis20 Sep 2024
- 2024MT-Ranker: Reference-free machine translation evaluation by inter-system ranking30 Jan 2024
- 2023Trained MT Metrics Learn to Cope with Machine-translated References1 Dec 2023
- 2023Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information Retrieval8 Nov 2023
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Natural Language Generation Advances from the Perspective of Digital Deception11 Aug 2022
- 2022Towards Automated Document Revision: Grammatical Error Correction, Fluency Edits, and Beyond23 May 2022
- 2022An Overview on Machine Translation Evaluation22 Feb 2022
- 2021SUper Team at SemEval-2016 Task 3: Building a feature-rich system for community question answering26 Sep 2021
- 2021Translation Quality Assessment: A Brief Survey on Manual and Automatic Methods5 May 2021